MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3008389809 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwz047.126

A127 THE ROLE OF ENDOGENOUS OPIOIDS IN MITIGATING OPIOID TOLERANCE IN A PRE-CLINICAL MODEL OF IBD

2020· article· en· W3008389809 on OpenAlexaff
Cintya D. Lopez Lopez, Josue O. Jaramillo Polanco, Yang Yu, David E. Reed, Alan Lomax, Stephen Vanner

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMorphineChronic painPharmacologyOpioidNeuropathic painEndogenous opioidEndogenyAnalgesicDrug toleranceNociceptionμ-opioid receptorColitisAnesthesiaInternal medicineReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background While opioid drugs are used to treat pain in IBD patients, escalating doses can induce tolerance and paradoxical increased pain signaling. Endogenous opioids are released by immune cells during chronic colitis and have an analgesic action but it is unknown whether they can mitigate the development of tolerance to opioid drugs in IBD. Aims To evaluate whether endogenous opioids released during chronic inflammation prevent the development of tolerance and/or increased pain signaling following chronic morphine treatment. Methods Three groups of C57BL/6 mice were studied: 1) control, 2) chronic colitis induced with 3 cycles of 2% DSS (cDSS mice) and 3) chronic DSS mice injected with escalating doses of morphine on the last 7 days of DSS (10, 20, 30 mg/kg for the first 3 days, then 40mg/kg on 4 to 7 day) (cDSS-morphine mice). Ex vivo afferent nerve recordings were obtained from flat-sheet distal colon preparations (day 31) to determine their mechanosensitivity by probing with a 1g von Frey hair before and after acute morphine (1μM, 10 min perfusion). In parallel experiments, supernatants were obtained from the proximal colon and incubated overnight with isolated dorsal root ganglia (DRG) neurons from control mice. Neuronal excitability was then examined by measuring the rheobase using perforated patch clamp. Results In afferent nerve recordings, acute application of 1μM morphine inhibited the colonic afferent response to probing in control mice (17.86 vs 12.31 Hz; p<0.05), whereas no effect of morphine was seen in cDSS mice. In cDSS-morphine mice acute morphine perfusion paradoxically increased the mean afferent response to probing (13.99 vs 17.28 Hz, p<0.05). Single units were analyzed to identify how many mechanosensitive responses were increased, decreased or not affected by acute morphine perfusion. Compared to control mice, cDSS mice exhibited increased numbers of unaffected units (6/18 vs 1/14) whereas cDSS-morphine mice had decreased number of inhibited units (1/17 vs 11/14) and increased number of excited units (8/17 vs. 2/14) (Figure 1). In patch clamp recordings, colonic supernatants from cDSS mice reduced the excitability of DRG neurons (rheobase increased 28%; p<0.05), however, this effect was lost in neurons incubated with cDSS-morphine supernatants. Conclusions Endogenous opioids released during cDSS colitis do not mitigate tolerance to chronic morphine exposure and may diminish the response to acute morphine. Moreover, the paradoxical hyperexcitable response to acute morphine induced by chronic morphine was not blocked by endogenous opioids. Our patch clamp data suggest that endogenous opioid actions are lost following chronic morphine exposure and could result from inhibition of their release from immune cells. Funding Agencies CCC

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicPain Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→