MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3008901859 · doi:10.1002/cpdd.773

Absolute Bioavailability of Vemurafenib in Patients With <i>BRAF</i><sup>V600</sup> Mutation–Positive Malignancies

2020· article· en· W3008901859 on OpenAlexaff
Weijiang Zhang, Dawn Colburn, Brian Simmons, Zsuzsanna Pápai, Enric Bertran, Simone Schadt, Christophe Husser, Harper Forbes, Dieter Roethlisberger, Thomas Härtung

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Pharmacology in Drug Development · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVemurafenibMedicineBioavailabilityMutationInternal medicineCancer researchOncologyPharmacologyCancerGeneticsMetastatic melanomaGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Vemurafenib is a BRAF kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation–positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma and Erdheim‐Chester disease. This phase 1, open‐label, single‐arm study was designed to estimate absolute bioavailability of oral vemurafenib at steady state and to characterize the pharmacokinetics of a single intravenous microdose of 14 C‐labeled vemurafenib in patients with BRAF V600 mutation–positive malignancies. Patients received oral vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily on days 1 through 28, with a single intravenous infusion of 14 C‐labeled vemurafenib solution (3 mL, corresponding to a radioactive dose of 18.5 kBq and a vemurafenib dose of 20 µg) given on the morning of day 21, immediately following the morning dose of oral vemurafenib. A total of 6 patients were enrolled. Four patients who received 14 C‐labeled vemurafenib infusion were included in the pharmacokinetic and bioavailability analyses. Geometric mean absolute bioavailability of oral vemurafenib at steady state, calculated as the ratio of dose‐normalized area under the curve during the dosing interval (AUC τ ) following oral vemurafenib dose to dose‐normalized AUC from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0‐inf ) following vemurafenib intravenous dose, was 57.8%. The majority of radioactivity (geometric mean 41%) was recovered in feces, and a small proportion (geometric mean 1.4%) was recovered in urine. Treatment‐emergent adverse events occurred in 5 of 6 (83%) patients and were all grade 1/2 in severity, except for 1 grade‐4 anaphylactic reaction occurring during infusion of 14 C‐labeled vemurafenib, which was thought to be related to the excipient polysorbate 80 in the intravenous formulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.741

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Pharmacology in Drug DevelopmentSame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207