MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3009317060 · doi:10.1016/j.oret.2020.02.015

Impact of Systemic Chemotherapy and Delayed Enucleation on Survival of Children with Advanced Intraocular Retinoblastoma

2020· article· en· W3009317060 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Retina · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicOcular Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsKrembil FoundationUniversity of AlbertaHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
FundersPrincess Margaret Cancer Foundation
KeywordsEnucleationMedicineCarboplatinChemotherapyHistopathologySurgeryRetinoblastomaEtoposidePathologyCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Primary enucleation is a well-established method to achieve cure for advanced intraocular retinoblastoma. Recent treatment advances have induced a trend toward trial eye salvage using chemotherapy or other modalities. We investigated how pre-enucleation/postenucleation systemic chemotherapy and the resulting delayed enucleation affect patient survival after failed trial eye salvage. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Children with Group D and E retinoblastoma primarily or secondarily enucleated at 29 Chinese treatment centers. METHODS: Data reviewed included clinical staging, time from diagnosis to enucleation, numbers of cycles of carboplatin, etoposide/teniposide and vincristine chemotherapy, disease-specific survival (DSS), histopathology, and follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was DSS. Secondary outcome was histopathology of enucleated eyes. RESULTS: Primarily enucleated eyes had significantly shorter delay from diagnosis to enucleation than eyes treated with pre-enucleation chemotherapy (P < 0.001). Delay between diagnosis and enucleation >3.5 months (Group D) and >2 months (Group E) decreased survival (Group D: P = 0.018; Group E: P = 0.017). Compared with primarily enucleated children, children with 1 to 3 cycles of pre-enucleation chemotherapy for Group E eyes had no significant difference in survival (P = 0.74), but those who received ≥4 cycles had worse survival (P = 0.025). After pre-enucleation chemotherapy, more children with Group E (but not Group D) eyes had high-risk histopathology (pT3/pT4) (Group D: P = 0.076; Group E: P < 0.001) and worse survival than those primarily enucleated (P < 0.001). Postenucleation chemotherapy improved survival of children with high-risk histopathology (pT3/pT4) (P = 0.001) but did not change survival of children with low-risk histopathology (pT1/pT2) (P = 0.52). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that pre-enucleation chemotherapy offered no survival benefit and timely enucleation minimized risk of metastatic death. Postenucleation chemotherapy improved survival of children with high-risk histopathology but was not useful for those with low-risk histopathology. These findings facilitate informed discussion on the risks and benefits of delayed enucleation, the use of systemic chemotherapy for trial salvage of eyes with advanced intraocular retinoblastoma, and the specific children who benefit from postenucleation chemotherapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.477

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it