MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3010054583 · doi:10.1002/cjce.23743

Therapeutic potential of a cell penetrating peptide (CPP, NP1) mediated siRNA delivery: Evidence in 3D spheroids of colon cancer cells

2020· article· en· W3010054583 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Khalsa Al‐Husaini, Erij Elkamel, Pu Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpheroidTransfectionGene knockdownRNA interferenceApoptosisIn vitroGene silencingSmall interfering RNACell-penetrating peptideCellChemistryCell biologyCancer researchCell cultureBiologyRNABiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract RNA interference holds great potential for cancer therapeutics and its success is highly dependent on an effective delivery system. As most preclinical drug screening in vitro was conducted in flat monolayer cell cultures, development of more physiologically relevant models is needed to enhance testing reliability and effectiveness. Here, the aim was to develop 3D cell spheroids and evaluate the efficiency of NP1, a novel cell penetrating peptide, CPP (STR‐H16R8), developed by our group to assist siRNA delivery. NP1 elicited significant cellular uptake of siRNA and promoted great siRNA knockdown efficiency of Bcl‐2 and VEGF mRNA in 3D spheroids (53% and 51%, respectively), induced marked apoptosis after silencing HIF mRNA, and 3D spheroids displayed apoptosis resistance compared to 2D cells. Taken together, 3D spheroids provide an improved model for testing siRNA delivery and NP1 has proved to be a powerful in vitro transfection reagent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.362

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryFrench-language works237,207