MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3012438372 · doi:10.1101/2020.03.18.20037846

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Pembrolizumab in Resectable Locally Advanced, Human Papillomavirus-Unrelated Head and Neck Cancer: A Multicenter, Phase 2 Trial

2020· preprint· en· W3012438372 on OpenAlexaff
Ravindra Uppaluri, Katie M. Campbell, Ann Marie Egloff, Paul Zolkind, Zachary L. Skidmore, Brian Nussenbaum, Randal C. Paniello, Jason T. Rich, Ryan S. Jackson, Patrik Pipkorn, Loren Michel, Jessica Ley, Peter Oppelt, Gavin P. Dunn, Erica K. Barnell, Nicholas C. Spies, Tianxiang Lin, Tiantian Li, David T. Mulder, Youstina Hanna, Iulia Cirlan, Trevor J. Pugh, Tenny Mudianto, Rachel Riley, Liye Zhou, Vickie Y. Jo, Matthew D. Stachler, Glenn J. Hanna, Jason Kass, Robert I. Haddad, Jonathan D. Schoenfeld, Evisa Gjini, Ana Lako, Wade L. Thorstad, Hiram A. Gay, Mackenzie Daly, Scott J. Rodig, Ian S. Hagemann, Dorina Kallogjeri, Jay F. Piccirillo, Rebecca D. Chernock, Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Douglas R. Adkins

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Cancer Studies
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchUniversity Health NetworkPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreMcGill Genome Centre
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNational Cancer InstituteNational Human Genome Research InstituteAlvin J. Siteman Cancer CenterNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial ResearchV Foundation for Cancer Research
KeywordsPembrolizumabMedicineHead and neck squamous-cell carcinomaOncologyInternal medicinePrimary tumorHead and neck cancerAdjuvantCancerSurgeryImmunotherapyMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Background Pembrolizumab improved survival of patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The aims of this phase 2 trial were to determine if pembrolizumab administered to patients with resectable locally advanced, human papillomavirus (HPV)-unrelated HNSCC would be safe, result in pathologic tumor response (pTR), and lower the relapse rate. Methods Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered 2-3 weeks before surgery. Resection of the primary tumor and involved/at-risk nodes was performed. Post-operative (chemo) radiation was planned. Patients with high-risk pathology (positive margins and/or extranodal extension) were to receive adjuvant pembrolizumab. pTR was quantified as the proportion of the resection bed with tumor necrosis, keratinous debris, and giant cells/histiocytes: pTR-0 (<10%), pTR-1 (10-49%), and pTR-2 (≥50%). Co-primary endpoints were pTR-2 among all patients, and one-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk pathology (historical: 35%). Correlations of baseline PD-L1 expression and T-cell infiltration with pTR were assessed, and tumor clonal dynamics were evaluated. Analyses were done per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov( NCT02296684 ), and is ongoing but closed to accrual. Findings Between June 30, 2015, and March 30, 2018, 36 patients enrolled. After neoadjuvant pembrolizumab, serious (grades 3-4) adverse events and unexpected surgical delays/complications did not occur. pTR-2 occurred in eight patients (22%), and pTR-1 in eight other patients (22%). pTR ≥10% correlated with baseline tumor PD-L1 expression, immune infiltrate, and IFN-γ pathway activity. Matched sample analysis showed compensatory upregulation of multiple immune inhibitory checkpoints in patients with pTR-0, and confirmed that clonal loss occurred in some patients. The one-year relapse rate among the eighteen patients with high-risk pathology was 16.7% (95%CI: 3.6-41.4%). Conclusions Among patients with locally advanced, HPV-unrelated HNSCC, neoadjuvant pembrolizumab was safe, and resulted in pTR-1 or pTR-2 in 44% of patients. The one-year relapse rate in patients with high-risk-pathology was lower than historical. Funding Merck, NCI, NIDCR, NHGRI and The V Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHead and Neck Cancer StudiesFrench-language works237,207