Experimental and numerical investigations of actuator disks for wind turbines
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The expenses of a wind turbine modeling in particular a wind farm modeling either numerically or experimentally cause to take the advantages of actuator disks (AD). Porous disks (PD) are used to simulate actuator disks in experiments especially for wake studies. A rotor of a wind turbine replaced by a PD can be modeled efficiently with less cost and process time. For a proper PD selection, some semi‐empirical equations are suggested for a range of solidity of 0.2‐0.6. These equations came from a number of tests. The PDs with different dimensions and solidity values were considered for the tests and models. The results of 2D and 3D numerical simulations and the experimental results show that at the solidity of 0.5, the coefficient of performance of a PD reaches approximately 16/27 which is equal to the Betz's limit; the relation between the coefficient of power and the solidity is fitted by a parabolic equation. The average error of the proposed equations for the power coefficient is reported 1.59%. Finally, based on the current results, some semi‐empirical equations are suggested to help the initial PD selection, and then, the cost of further studies may decrease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it