MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“Smac”ing the Life out of XIAP

2020· article· en· W3017104109 on OpenAlexaff
James Greig, Elfin Akteke, Sarah Doshi, Eva He, Kento Fujikawa, Katya Lawrence, Natalie Feberova, Miwa Hayashi, Rizhe Jia, Maggie Jin, Emily Leha, Morgan Powter, Delphine Jiameng Shen, Samuel Walker, Robert G. Korneluk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCell death mechanisms and regulation
Canadian institutionsAgricultural Research Institute of Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXIAPInhibitor of apoptosisOncolytic virusApoptosisCaspaseCell biologyCancer cellImmune systemBiologyChemistryCancer researchBiochemistryProgrammed cell deathImmunologyCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X‐linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein (XIAP) is a key prosurvival protein that blocks apoptosis by inhibiting both the intrinsic and extrinsic pathways. Released by the mitochondria when under stress, XIAP is a homodimer, with 2 sets of repeating type I and type II baculoviral IAP domains: BIR1, BIR2 and BIR3, and RING. XIAP has a capacity to block apoptosis by directly inhibiting caspases 3,7 and 9. Second mitochondria‐derived activator of caspases (Smac) is a 184 amino acid chain. Smac antagonizes XIAP by attaching to the BIR3 domain inhibiting the binding of caspase‐9. Synthetic Smac mimetics (SMs) have been designed to duplicate the N‐terminal tetrapeptide (AVPI) or the IAP‐binding motif (IBM). Our model aims to show two BIR3 domain of a homodimer XIAP, bound to the IAP‐binding motif (IBM) of a Smac dimer. Selective antagonism of XIAP, specifically the BIR3 by Smac/SMs or monotherapy is not enough to kill cancer cells, however, it could be combined with immunotherapy, specifically virotherapy. This tricks the immune system to think that the cancer cells have a virus, which stimulates the immune antiviral response and creates an overproduction of immune cells known as a “cytokine storm”, to kill cancer cells. Support or Funding Information The Ashbury College MSOE Center for BioMolecular Modeling SMART Team used 3D modeling and printing technology to examine structure‐function relationships between Smac and BIR3 of XIAP.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.043

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicCell death mechanisms and regulationFrench-language works237,207