MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3019822976 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107522

Cathepsin S Alterations Induce a Tumor-Promoting Immune Microenvironment in Follicular Lymphoma

2020· article· en· W3019822976 on OpenAlexaff
Deepak Bararia, Johannes Adrian Hildebrand, Sebastian Stolz, Sarah Haebe, Stefan Alig, Christopher Trevisani, Francisco Osorio‐Barrios, Michael D. Bartoschek, Michael Mentz, Alessandro Pastore, Erik Gaitzsch, Michael Heide, Vindi Jurinović, Katharina Rautter, Jay Gunawardana, Muhammed B. Sabdia, Monika Szczepanowski, Julia Richter, Wolfgang Hiddemann, Abner Louissaint, Christina Ludwig, Sebastian Bultmann, Heinrich Leonhardt, Sebastian Eustermann, Karl‐Peter Hopfner, Michael von Bergwelt‐Baildon, Christian Steidl, Robert Kridel, Joshua W.D. Tobin, Maher K. Gandhi, David M. Weinstock, Marc Schmidt‐Supprian, Menyhárt B. Sárosi, Martina Rudelius, Verena Passerini, Josef Mautner, Oliver Weigert

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicImmunotherapy and Immune Responses
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BC
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean Hematology AssociationDeutsche KrebshilfeBMC Software
KeywordsFollicular lymphomaTumor microenvironmentImmune systemLymphomaCancer researchImmunologyCathepsinFollicular phaseBiologyMedicineEnzymeInternal medicineBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

T cell infiltration and proinflammatory cytokine perturbation in a mouse model and in human FLs. In mice, this CTSS-induced immune microenvironment promoted tumor growth. Clinically, patients with CTSS-hyperactive FL had better treatment outcomes with standard immunochemotherapies, indicating that these immunosuppressive regimens target both the lymphoma cells and the tumor-promoting immune microenvironment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.073
Threshold uncertainty score0.924

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations77
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicImmunotherapy and Immune ResponsesFrench-language works237,207