MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3021366882 · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-20-0087

Combined Targeting of the BRD4–NUT–p300 Axis in NUT Midline Carcinoma by Dual Selective Bromodomain Inhibitor, NEO2734

2020· article· en· W3021366882 on OpenAlexaff
Chevaun D. Morrison-Smith, Tatiana M. Knox, Ivona Filic, Kara M. Soroko, Benjamin K. Eschle, Margaret K. Wilkens, Prafulla C. Gokhale, Francis J. Giles, Andrew M. Griffin, B. Brown, Geoffrey I. Shapiro, Beth E. Zucconi, Philip A. Cole, Madeleine E. Lemieux, Christopher A. French

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Degradation and Inhibitors
Canadian institutionsCanadian Optometric Education Trust FundParaza Pharma (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of General Medical SciencesGenentech
KeywordsBromodomainNutBRD4BiologyCancer researchMedicinePharmacologyChemistryGeneticsHistoneDNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) is a rare, aggressive subtype of squamous carcinoma that is driven by the BRD4-NUT fusion oncoprotein. BRD4, a BET protein, binds to chromatin through its two bromodomains, and NUT recruits the p300 histone acetyltransferse (HAT) to activate transcription of oncogenic target genes. BET-selective bromodomain inhibitors have demonstrated on-target activity in patients with NMC, but with limited efficacy. P300, like BRD4, contains a bromodomain. We show that combining selective p300/CBP and BET bromodomain inhibitors, GNE-781 and OTX015, respectively, induces cooperative depletion of MYC and synergistic inhibition of NMC growth. Treatment of NMC cells with the novel dual p300/CBP and BET bromodomain–selective inhibitor, NEO2734, potently inhibits growth and induces differentiation of NMC cells in vitro; findings that correspond with potentiated transcriptional effects from combined BET and p300 bromodomain inhibition. In three disseminated NMC xenograft models, NEO2734 provided greater growth inhibition, with tumor regression and significant survival benefit seen in two of three models, compared with a lead clinical BET inhibitor or “standard” chemotherapy. Our findings provide a strong rationale for clinical study of NEO2734 in patients with NMC. Moreover, the synergistic inhibition of NMC growth by CBP/p300 and BET bromodomain inhibition lays the groundwork for greater mechanistic understanding of the interplay between p300 and BRD4-NUT that drives this cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.871

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations87
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicProtein Degradation and InhibitorsFrench-language works237,207