MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Genomic markers of panitumumab resistance including ERBB2/HER2 in a phase II study of <i>KRAS</i> wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2015· article· en· W3023069627 on OpenAlexaff
Garrett Barry, Hector Li-Chang, Hagen F. Kennecke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKRASPanitumumabColorectal cancerMedicineCancer researchCancerMutationPoint mutationPrimary tumorOncologyInternal medicineGeneBiologyGeneticsMetastasis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

646 Background: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors (EGFRi) are effective agents in the treatment of mCRC but up to one third of KRAS wt tumors do not respond. The primary objective was to identify a gene expression signature associated with primary resistance to panitumumab (Pmab) monotherapy and identify genomic markers associated with resistance. Methods: Patients with previously treated codon 12/13 KRAS wt mCRC were administered Pmab 6mg/kg IV q2weeks in a prospective phase II study. The primary endpoint was tumor response by RECIST and patients with progressive disease 8 weeks after initial Pmab were classified as resistant. Gene expression analysis was performed using a Nanostring-based assay with candidate genes implied in EGFRi resistance expression patterns. Differentially expressed genes were identified by Significance Analysis of Microarrays. Further interrogation of the HER2 signaling pathway was performed by immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization. Illumina-based targeted resequencing was conducted on 20 cancer-implicated genes. Results: Of 34 patients treated with Pmab, 11 (32%) had progressive disease at 8 weeks and were classified Pmab resistant. A 5-gene expression signature was significantly associated with Pmab resistance (p = 0.001), including ERBB2, MLPH, IRX3, c11orf9, and KLK6. HER2 protein was overexpressed in 4/11 resistant and 0/21 responding cases (p = 0.035). Two (2) resistant tumors had ERBB2 gene amplification only, and one demonstrated both ERBB2 amplification and mutation. A non-codon 12/13 RAS mutation occurred in one treatment-resistant patient and was mutually exclusive with ERBB2 mutation, amplification, or HER2 overexpression. Four BRAF mutations were detected, two occurring in resistant patients. Conclusions: In this prospective study, a 5-gene signature including ERBB2 was associated with primary resistance to single agent Pmab. A subgroup of patients had evidence of aberrant HER2/ERBB2 signaling by protein over-expression and gene amplification. Results suggest a significant portion of KRAS wt tumors unresponsive to EGFRi may be identified by gene signature analysis. Clinical trial information: NCT00853931.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicColorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesFrench-language works237,207