MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pembrolizumab in combination with the oncolytic virus pelareorep in patients progressing on systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A phase II study.

2020· article· en· W3030671769 on OpenAlexaff
Devalingam Mahalingam, Aparna Kalyan, Sheetal Kircher, Victoria Maurer, Masha Kocherginsky, Jiahui Xu, Pedro Viveiros, Elena Vagia, Grey Wilkinson, Matthew Coffey, Mary F. Mulcahy, Al B. Benson, Bin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsOncolytics Biotech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePembrolizumabOncolytic virusResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsInternal medicineProgressive diseaseChemotherapyOncologyGastroenterologyAdverse effectImmunotherapyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e16789 Background: Pelareorep is an intravenously delivered oncolytic reovirus that can induce a T-cell-inflamed phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Analysis of tumor tissue from patients treated with pelareorep have shown reovirus replication, T-cell infiltration, and upregulation of PD-L1. We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination pembrolizumab in patients with PDAC would lead to improved response, effective T-cell recognition of tumor antigens and expand peripheral T-cell repertoire. Methods: This investigator-initiated phase II study enrolled PDAC patients who progressed after first-line treatment. Patients received pelareorep at a dose of 4.5x1010TCID50IV on Days 1, 2, 3 & 8of Cycle (C) 1, and Days 1 & 8 with C2 onwards. Pembrolizumab was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle at 200 mg IV. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included evaluation for reovirus replication and immune analysis in peripheral blood and tumor biopsies. The study was designed using Simon’s two-stage design with 90% power and one-sided alpha = 0.025 to compare 10% vs. 35% ORR. A total of ≥2/11 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Disease control was achieved in 30% of the 12 efficacy-evaluable patients. One patient achieved partial response. Three additional patients achieved stable disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, including flu-like symptoms. Viral replication was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies. T-cell receptor sequencing from peripheral blood revealed a high degree of peripheral repertoire turnover and creation of new T-cell clones during treatment. Immune correlation with efficacy analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: Pelareorep with pembrolizumab showed manageable safety profiles and modest efficacy in an unselected PDAC population. The study will not proceed to stage II, however further evaluation of anti-tumor activity of pelareorep and anti-PD-1 therapy is now planned in biomarker defined patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03723915 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→