MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CodeBreak 100: Phase I study of AMG 510, a novel KRAS<sup>G12C</sup> inhibitor, in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors other than non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).

2020· article· en· W3031446019 on OpenAlexaff
David S. Hong, James Kuo, Adrian G. Sacher, Fabrice Barlési, Benjamin Besse, Yasutoshi Kuboki, Grace K. Dy, Vikas Dembla, John C. Krauss, Timothy F. Burns, June Myung Kim, Haby Henary, Gataree Ngarmchamnanrith, Bob T. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
FundersAmgen
KeywordsKRASMedicineColorectal cancerCancerTolerabilityInternal medicineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsClinical endpointLung cancerOncologyPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologyClinical trialAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3511 Background: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog ( KRAS) p.G12C mutation occurs in approximately 13% of NSCLC and 1%–3% of CRC and other solid tumors. AMG 510 is a first-in-class small molecule that specifically and irreversibly inhibits KRASG12C. Previously, AMG 510 showed preliminary antitumor activity and favorable tolerability in pts with KRAS p.G12C mutant NSCLC or CRC in the phase 1, first-in-human trial. Here, we report results in pts with other tumor types from the same trial. Methods: This study evaluates AMG 510 in pts with locally-advanced or metastatic KRAS p.G12C mutant solid tumors. Key inclusion criteria: KRAS p.G12C mutation via local testing and prior systemic anticancer treatment (tx). Oral daily doses of 180, 360, 720, and 960 mg were tested in the dose escalation, and 960 mg was selected for expansion. Primary endpoint is safety; key secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics and objective response rate as assessed per RECIST 1.1. Response is assessed every 6 weeks (wks) for 24 wks then every 12 wks thereafter. Results: As of January 8, 2020, 25 pts (9 female, median age 60 years [range: 40–75]) with tumor types categorized by investigators as histology other than NSCLC and CRC were enrolled and dosed (10 pancreatic cancer, 4 appendiceal cancer, 2 endometrial cancer, 2 unknown primary cancer, 1 bile duct cancer, 1 sinonasal cancer, 1 ampullary cancer, 1 small bowel cancer, 1 melanoma, 1 small cell lung cancer, and 1 esophageal cancer). 23 pts received 960 mg dose. 20 pts (80.0%) had ≥2 prior lines of tx. At data cutoff, 13 pts (52.0%) remained on tx; 9 (36.0%) and 3 (12.0%) pts remained on tx for ≥3 and ≥6 months, respectively. Median follow up was 4.3 months (range: 0.1–12.6). Tx-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 9 pts (36.0%). 2 pts (8.0%) had grade 3 TRAEs, including diarrhea (1/25) and pneumonia (1/25, serious AE). No dose-limiting toxicities, grade ≥4, or fatal TRAEs were reported. No TRAEs led to tx discontinuation. 3 pts had not been followed up for ≥7 wks by the data cutoff. 22 pts were followed up for ≥7 wks, and their best overall responses were: 3 confirmed partial response (1 appendiceal, 1 melanoma, and 1 endometrial), 13 stable disease (6 pancreatic, 2 appendiceal, 1 ampullary, 1 bile duct, 1 endometrial, 1 sinonasal, and 1 unknown primary), and 6 progressive disease. Conclusions: AMG 510 was well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in pts with advanced KRAS p.G12C mutant solid tumors other than NSCLC and CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03600883 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.439
Teacher spread0.398 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Treatments and MutationsFrench-language works237,207