MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033545112 · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0941-1

Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group

2020· letter· en· W3033545112 on OpenAlexafffund
Viknesh Sounderajah, Hutan Ashrafian, Ravi Aggarwal, Jeffrey De Fauw, Alastair K. Denniston, Felix Greaves, Alan Karthikesalingam, Dominic King, Xiaoxuan Liu, Sheraz R. Markar, Matthew D. F. McInnes, Trishan Panch, Jonathan Pearson‐Stuttard, Daniel Ting, Robert Golub, David Moher, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Ara Darzi

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Medicine · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreSingapore Eye Research InstituteNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchImperial College LondonDeepMindUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustAlan Turing InstituteOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsSteering committeeDiagnostic accuracyPsychological interventionMedicineMedical physicsPsychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineEngineeringEngineering management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.563
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.710
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.538

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5630.710
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.014
Bibliometrics0.0120.011
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.010
Open science0.0180.014
Research integrity0.0590.049
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.650
GPT teacher head0.604
Teacher spread0.046 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations258
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNature MedicineSame topicArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationFrench-language works237,207