MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3033956961 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.04.135657

Potential for virus endogenization in humans through testicular germ cell infection: the case of HIV

2020· preprint· en· W3033956961 on OpenAlexaff
Dominique Mahé, Giulia Matusali, Claire Deléage, Raquel L. L. S. Alvarenga, Anne-Pascale Satié, Amélie Pagliuzza, Romain Mathiéu, Sylvain Lavoué, Bernard Jégou, Luiz R. França, Nicolas Chomont, Laurent Houzet, Antoine D. Rolland, Nathalie Dejucq‐Rainsford

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicHIV Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesSidactionInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsBiologyGermlineVirologyPopulationRetrovirusEndogenous retrovirusVirusGerm cellMacaqueGenomeImmunologyGeneticsGeneMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Viruses have colonized the germ line of our ancestors at several occasions during evolution, leading to the integration in the human genome of viral sequences from over 30 retroviral groups and a few non-retroviruses. Among the recently emerged viruses infecting humans, several target the testis (eg HIV, Zika and Ebola viruses). Here we aimed to investigate whether human testicular germ cells (TGCs) can support integration by HIV, a contemporary retrovirus that started to spread in the human population during the last century. We report that albeit alternative receptors enabled HIV-1 binding to TGCs, HIV virions failed to infect TGCs in vitro . Nevertheless, exposure of TGCs to infected lymphocytes, naturally present in the testis from HIV+ men, led to HIV-1 entry, integration and early protein expression. Similarly, cell-associated infection or bypassing viral entry led to HIV-1 integration in a spermatogonial cell line. Using DNAscope, HIV-1 and SIV DNA were detected within a few TGCs in the testis from one infected patient, one rhesus macaque and one African Green monkey in vivo . Molecular landscape analysis revealed that early TGCs were enriched in HIV early co-factors up to integration and had overall low antiviral defenses when compared with testicular macrophages and Sertoli cells. In conclusion, our study reveals that TGCs can support the entry and integration of HIV upon cell-associated infection. This could represent a way for this contemporary virus to integrate our germline and become endogenous in the future, as happened during human evolution for a number of viruses. Importance Viruses have colonized the host germ line at many occasions during evolution to eventually become endogenous. Here we aimed at investigating whether human testicular germ cells (TGCs) can support such viral invasion by studying HIV interactions with TGCs in vitro . Our results indicate that isolated primary TGCs express alternative HIV-1 receptors allowing virions binding but not entry. However, HIV-1 entered and integrated in TGCs upon cell-associated infection, and produced low level of viral proteins. In vivo , HIV-1 and SIV DNA was detected in a few TGCs. Molecular landscape analysis showed that TGCs have overall weak antiviral defenses. Altogether, our results indicate that human TGCs can support HIV-1 early replication including integration, suggesting potential for endogenization in the future generations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicHIV Research and Treatment→French-language works237,207→