MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034021106 · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2020.101856

Generation of two patient-derived iPSC lines from siblings (LIBUCi001-A and LIBUCi002-A) and a genetically modified iPSC line (JMUi001-A-1) to mimic dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia (DCMA) caused by a homozygous DNAJC19 mutation

2020· article· en· W3034021106 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Janz, Ruping Chen, Martina Regensburger, Yuichiro Ueda, Simone Rost, Eva Klopocki, Katharina Günther, Frank Edenhofer, Henry J. Duff, Süleyman Ergün, Brenda Gerull

Bibliographic record

VenueStem Cell Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
FundersBundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
KeywordsInduced pluripotent stem cellBiologyGerm layerSendai virusCRISPRAtaxiaReprogrammingKaryotypeMutationDilated cardiomyopathyCardiomyopathyCell cultureCell biologyMolecular biologyCancer researchGeneticsInternal medicineEmbryonic stem cellCellChromosomeHeart failureGeneNeuroscienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dilated cardiomyopathy with ataxia (DCMA) is an autosomal recessive disorder arising from mutations in DNAJC19. Two patient-derived dermal fibroblast cell lines of siblings with the same homozygous splice acceptor site mutation in DNAJC19 (NM_145261.4):c.130-1G>C were reprogrammed into induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines (LIBUCi001-A and LIBUCi002-A) using non-integrative Sendai virus. Additionally, a third DNAJC19tv (truncation variant) iPSC line (JMUi001-A-1) was generated by CRISPR/Cas9 in healthy control iPSCs (JMUi001-A). All three DCMA iPSC lines present normal karyotypes, high expression of pluripotency markers and the capacity to differentiate into cells of all three germ layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.917

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStem Cell ResearchSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207