MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034858522 · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30483-7

A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research

2020· review· en· W3034858522 on OpenAlexafffund
John C. Marshall, Srinivas Murthy, Janet Dı́az, Neeta Adhikari, Derek Angus, Yaseen M. Arabi, J. Kenneth Baillie, Michael Bauer, Scott Berry, Bronagh Blackwood, Marc J. M. Bonten, Fernando A. Bozza, Frank M. Brunkhorst, Allen Cheng, Mike Clarke, Vu Quoc Dat, Menno D. de Jong, Justin T. Denholm, Lennie Derde, Jake Dunning, Xiaobin Feng, Tom Fletcher, Nadine E. Foster, Rob Fowler, Nina Gobat, Charles D. Gomersall, Anthony Gordon, Thomas Glueck, Michael O. Harhay, Carol Hodgson, Peter Horby, Yae‐Jean Kim, Richard Kojan, Bharath Kumar, John G. Laffey, Denis Malvey, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Colin McArthur, Stephen McBride, Shay McGuinness, Laura Merson, Susan C. Morpeth, Dale M. Needham, Mihai G. Netea, Myoung‐don Oh, Sabai Phyu, Simone Piva, Ruijin Qiu, Halima Salisu-Kabara, Lei Shi, Naoki Shimizu, Jorge Sinclair, Steven Y. C. Tong, Alexis F. Turgeon, Tim Uyeki, Frank L. van de Veerdonk, Steve Webb, Paula Williamson, Timo Wolf, Junhua Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Infectious Diseases · 2020
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Measure (data warehouse)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakOutcome (game theory)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Set (abstract data type)MedicineComputer scienceMathematicsVirologyData miningInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.076
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.129
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0760.129
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0150.013
Bibliometrics0.0090.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0050.008
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.696
GPT teacher head0.646
Teacher spread0.050 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
DomainMethods
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,794
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Infectious DiseasesSame topicCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsFrench-language works237,207