MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract A09: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a source of ctDNA for diagnosis and monitoring of pediatric patients with midline diffuse gliomas

2020· article· en· W3035811149 on OpenAlexaff
Liana Nobre, Robert Siddaway, Monique Johnson, Scott Ryall, Michal Zápotocký, J Bennet, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPDGFRAMedicineLiquid biopsyDigital polymerase chain reactionGliomaBiopsyPathologyCerebrospinal fluidExome sequencingDNA sequencingKRASOncologyMutationInternal medicineCancer researchGenePolymerase chain reactionBiologyCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Midline diffuse gliomas are aggressive pediatric tumors, characterized molecularly by the presence of H3K27 mutation. These tumors are extremely malignant, with median overall survival of less than a year. Localized mainly in the pons or thalamic regions, they are not amenable to a gross total resection; however, a biopsy is needed for pathologic and molecular diagnosis. In this scenario, liquid biopsy is of utmost importance and has the potential to spare the risk of morbidity with surgical procedures, determine diagnosis and prognosis, as well as serve as a tool to identify potential targetable alterations. The objective of this pilot feasibility study is to explore the use of CSF ctDNA using ddPCR and next-generation sequencing tools to diagnose and monitor patients with midline diffuse gliomas. Methods: We extracted CSF ct DNA collected from external ventricular drain in two patients diagnosed with midline diffuse glioma (one thalamic glioblastoma, one DIPG). ctDNA was extracted from 2 mL of CSF, quantification was done by quibit, and samples were processed first with ddPCR for detection of H3K27M point mutation followed by comprehensive profiling by whole-exome sequencing using Illumina HiSeq2500 sequencer. We assessed the feasibility of identifying diagnostic point mutations, as well as potential evolution of the tumor molecular landscape at disease progression. Results: The first case, a thalamic GBM, had tissue available for molecular analysis; targeted RNA sequencing was performed on a clinical basis detecting H3K27M mutation (VAF=43%) and a PDGFRA N659K mutation (VAF=43%). ddPCR analysis of the CSF ctDNA identified the H3K27M mutation with VAF of 14%. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) confirmed the presence of H3K27M point mutation at VAF 11% and PDGFRA mutation at VAF 13%. This patient received radiation and chemotherapy but progressed rapidly and passed 7 months after the diagnosis. The second case, a DIPG diagnosed upon radiologicl and clinical criteria, was previously treated with conventional focal radiation and needed an EVD upon massive leptomeningeal progression with associated meningitis. CSF was then processed for ctDNA analysis. ddPCR confirmed the presence of H3K27M mutation with VAF of 48%. WES confirmed the presence of H3K27M mutation (VAF 14%) and additional TP53 R273C point mutation with VAF of 87%. This patient passed roughly 11 months post diagnosis. Conclusion: We have demonstrated the feasibility of detection of molecular markers in CSF through ddPCR and NGS platform to not only to assist in diagnosis of pediatric midline diffuse gliomas, but also to monitor these patients for additional/new molecular events that may be targetable. Building on these results, we are currently implementing a targeted sequencing panel to establish the specificity of this method in a large pediatric brain tumor cohort. Citation Format: Liana Nobre, Robert Siddaway, Monique Johnson, Scott Ryall, Michal Zapotocky, Julie Bennet, Uri Tabori, Cynthia Hawkins. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a source of ctDNA for diagnosis and monitoring of pediatric patients with midline diffuse gliomas [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr A09.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.471
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer Research→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→