← Back to cohort
Standardising definitions for the pre-eclampsia core outcome set: A consensus development study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Bibliographic record
VenuePregnancy Hypertension · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDelphi Technique in Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel HillBalliol College, University of OxfordWeill Cornell Medical CollegeUniversité de ParisSchool of Nursing, University of WashingtonBarts Health NHS TrustSt George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustUniversität LeipzigMedical Research CouncilUniversità degli Studi di BresciaMedical Research Council CanadaUniversiteit StellenboschChulalongkorn UniversityUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversiteit UtrechtUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaKU LeuvenUniversité de MontréalUniversity of WashingtonUniversity of Pennsylvania Health SystemCurtin University of TechnologyMonash UniversityUniversity of AberdeenOulun YliopistoImperial College LondonUniversity of TorontoUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillQueen Mary University of LondonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchUniversité de SherbrookeNorthwell HealthKing's College LondonUniversidade Estadual PaulistaKarl-Franzens-Universität GrazUniversity of NottinghamUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS TrustUniversity College LondonImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustWestern Sydney UniversityBritish Heart FoundationPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhNorth Bristol NHS TrustRijksuniversiteit GroningenDrexel UniversityUniversity of LeicesterKeele UniversitySouth Australian Health and Medical Research InstituteJichi Medical UniversityNational Institute for Social Care and Health ResearchBarts CharityMedizinische Universität GrazUniversity of PennsylvaniaBurnet InstituteMount Royal UniversityChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of LeedsUniversity Hospitals Plymouth NHS TrustNational Center for Child Health and DevelopmentUniversity of OxfordUniversity of Dundee
KeywordsOutcome (game theory)EclampsiaCore (optical fiber)Set (abstract data type)Computer scienceMedicineIntensive care medicinePregnancyProgramming languageMathematicsTelecommunications
Abstract
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score1.000
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Opus teacher head0.651
GPT teacher head0.491
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itQuick stats
Citations21
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractno