MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract PR09: Frequency and etiology of ctDNA-positive metastatic prostate cancer with BRCA2, ATM, or CDK12 mutations

2020· article· en· W3036626624 on OpenAlexaff
Evan W. Warner, Steven Yip, Matti Annala, Gang Wang, Arkhjamil Angeles, Arshia Beigi, Elena Schönlau, Amanda Wong, Sinja Taavitsainen, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Kevin Beja, Matti Nykter, Daniel Khalaf, Kim Chi, Alexander W. Wyatt

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Cancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENCancer researchProstate cancerMutationCancerCDKN2AGermline mutationBiologyDNA repairGermlineDNA damageSomatic cellGeneMedicineGeneticsDNAPI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwaySignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recent sequencing efforts have shown that genomic alterations within DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways are relatively common in metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). Patients harboring DDR gene aberrations can respond poorly to standard-of-care androgen receptor (AR)-targeted therapy, potentially because defective DNA repair enables rapid tumor evolution. Research has shown that DDR-deficient mPCa is often genetically unstable due to its high mutation frequency; however, the specific differences in mutations and copy number alterations between DDR mutant and nonmutant tumors have not been established. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing on 1,214 cell-free DNA samples from 718 patients with mPCa. In 30 patients with disruption of BRCA2, ATM, or CDK12, we also sequenced archival primary tumor tissue. 118 patients had a deleterious germline or somatic mutation in at least one of the 22 DDR genes on our targeted panel. The most commonly altered were BRCA2 (n=41), ATM (n=20), and CDK12 (n=21), together present in ~14% of patients. Disruption of the intact second allele was detected in 96%, 82%, and 84% of patients with mutations in BRCA2, ATM, and CDK12, respectively. Patients with a mutation in any one of these genes had fewer mutations in TP53 than a control cohort of DDR-intact patients (p<0.05). However, BRCA2-defective patients had frequent compound deletions of tumor-suppressor genes (TP53, PTEN, RB1). In patients with CDK12 mutations, PTEN or RB1 deletion was rare and samples instead exhibited copy number gains of MDM2 and/or CCND1. ATM-deficient cases did not demonstrate the same degree of genomic instability as either BRCA2- or CDK12-defective disease. In summary, patients with BRCA2, ATM, or CDK12 gene disruption possess distinct patterns of genomic alterations. These findings might help clarify why some DDR-deficient mPCa cases represent a more aggressive disease subtype with a poor response to AR-targeted therapy. This abstract is also being presented as Poster A36. Citation Format: Evan Warner, Steven Yip, Matti Annala, Gang Wang, Arkhjamil Angeles, Arshia Beigi, Elena Schönlau, Amanda Wong, Sinja Taavitsainen, Gillian Vandekerkhove, Kevin Beja, Matti Nykter, Daniel Khalaf, Kim Chi, Alexander Wyatt. Frequency and etiology of ctDNA-positive metastatic prostate cancer with BRCA2, ATM, or CDK12 mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Liquid Biopsies; Jan 13-16, 2020; Miami, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2020;26(11_Suppl):Abstract nr PR09.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.315
GPT teacher head0.553
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Cancer ResearchSame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207