MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3036967235 · doi:10.1101/2020.06.18.160689

Cryptosporulation in <i>Kurthia</i> spp. forces a rethinking of asporogenesis in Firmicutes

2020· preprint· en· W3036967235 on OpenAlexafffund
Sevasti Filippidou, Mathilda Fatton, Thomas Junier, Matthieu Bergé, Daniel Poppleton, Thorsten B. Blum, Marek Kaminek, Adolfo Odriozola, Jochen Blom, Shannon L. Johnson, Jan Pieter Abrahams, Patrick Chain, Simonetta Gribaldo, Elitza I. Tocheva, Benoît Zuber, Patrick H. Viollier, Pilar Junier

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Pierre Mercier pour la ScienceFondation Pierre MercierBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMcGill UniversityGerman Network for Bioinformatics InfrastructureNational Science Foundation
KeywordsFirmicutesEndosporeBiologyBacilliSporeMicrobiologyLineage (genetic)GeneticsGenomeBacteriaGene16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Sporulation is a complex morphophysiological process resulting in a cellular structure that is more resistant than the vegetative form. In Firmicutes, this structure is produced within the mother cell, and is called an endospore. Endospore formation is thought to have evolved in the common ancestor of Firmicutes. However, sporulation has apparently been lost in some extant lineages that are defined as asporogenic . We isolated strain 11kri321, a representative of the genus Kurthia , from an oligotrophic geothermal reservoir. While Kurthia spp. is considered to comprise only asporogenic species, strain 11kri321 produced spores. Genomic reconstruction of the sporulation pathway shows elements typical of sporulation in Bacilli, including the signaling for sporulation onset. However, key genes were missing, including those involved in engulfment and dipicolinic acid synthesis. Based on the results for strain 11kri321, sporulation was investigated in other Kurthia strains. Genes involved in signaling, cell division and spore coat formation were detected in three available Kurthia genomes. Moreover, endosporulation was clearly visualized in at least two of the four strains tested. These results show that Kurthia is an endospore-forming Firmicute lineage. However, the genetic background of sporulation in this genus deviates from the known sporulation pathway in Firmicutes and even within Bacilli, suggesting that a revision of the minimal set of genes used for genomic detection of sporulation is required. Based on our findings we propose the term cryptosporulant to refer to putative asporogenic Firmicutes for which a detailed genomic and physiological characterization of sporulating is missing. Importance Endospore-forming Firmicutes include many environmental and medical relevant bacterial clades. In these microorganisms, the ability to produce endospores is essential for survival in the environment and even for pathogenesis. The minimum core of genes required to produce a viable and resistant spore, the distinction between endospore-forming and asporogenic groups, as well as the evolution of sporulation have been a subject of investigation and debate for decades. Here, we demonstrate endosporulation in the genus Kurthia, considered as asporogenic. Morphological, physiological and genomic analyses were undertaken to demonstrate that sporulation is not lost within this lineage. Based on our results we propose a re-examination of the minimal genetic requirements of sporulation and the use of the term cryptosporulant to describe lineages of Firmicutes that have not previously been observed to sporulate, but for which a detailed analysis is still missing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies→French-language works237,207→