MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3042769712 · doi:10.1029/2020wr027144

What Is a Debris Flood?

2020· article· en· W3042769712 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Church, Matthias Jakob

Bibliographic record

VenueWater Resources Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsBGC Engineering (Canada)University of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDebrisDebris flowGeologyFlood mythTributaryChannel (broadcasting)Context (archaeology)Hydrology (agriculture)Natural hazardSTREAMSGeotechnical engineeringGeomorphologyGeographyEngineeringCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Debris floods have been defined descriptively as mineral and organic sediment‐rich floods, occurring in a steep channel and potentially destabilizing the streambed and banks. While this definition allows one to visualize the process, it does not inform on the mechanics, nor does it recognize different types. We propose to define debris floods as “floods during which the entire bed, possibly barring the very largest clasts, becomes mobile for at least a few minutes and over a length scale of at least 10 times the channel width.” We define the onset of a debris flood by the exceedance of a critical shear stress threshold required to mobilize at least the D 84 of bed material. A threefold classification is proposed in which the first type is triggered by the shear stress exceedance. The second is initiated by transition from a debris flow either in the channel or by oblique impact of a debris‐flow‐prone tributary. In this context we highlight the importance of effective fluid density. The third type is associated with outbreak floods from artificial or natural dams. A further subdivision of debris floods is made by using the ratio of the actual shear stress to the critical shear stress, with higher values indicating damaging and finally catastrophic debris floods in which even preexisting channel bank and bed protection is mobilized. This contribution aims to provide a more succinct mechanistic definition of debris floods that can be implemented in hazard and risk assessments for steep streams and rivers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations136
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWater Resources ResearchSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207