Long-term administration of cariprazine increases locus coeruleus noradrenergic neurons activity and serotonin <sub>1A</sub> receptor neurotransmission in the hippocampus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Cariprazine, the novel dopamine (DA) D 3 -preferring D 3 /D 2 and serotonin (5-HT) 1A receptor partial agonist, has activity as an adjunctive therapy in major depressive disorder (MDD). Aims: This study aims to investigate the effects of chronic cariprazine administration in combination with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram on the activity of monoaminergic systems. Methods: Rats received cariprazine alone and in adjunct to escitalopram for 2 and 14 days and the firing activity of dorsal raphe nucleus 5-HT, locus coeruleus norepinephrine (NE) and ventral tegmental area DA neurons was assessed. 5-HT and NE neurotransmission in hippocampus pyramidal neurons was evaluated by assessing tonic activation of their 5-HT 1A , and α 1 - and α 2 -adrenergic receptors, using their selective antagonists. Results: Two and 14-day cariprazine regimens increased the firing rate of NE, but not 5-HT and DA neurons. Addition of cariprazine to escitalopram reversed the inhibitory effect of escitalopram on NE but not 5-HT and DA neurons. In the hippocampus, there was an increase in neurotransmission at 5-HT 1A receptors in cariprazine-treated rats, but no change in overall NE transmission by either regimen. Conclusion: Cariprazine increased NE neuronal firing and reversed the escitalopram-induced inhibition of these neurons. Despite a lack of effect on 5-HT neuronal firing activity, there was an increase in tonic activation of hippocampus 5-HT 1A receptors by cariprazine alone but not with the combination. These effects provide a possible rationale for the clinical efficacy of cariprazine as an adjunctive strategy in patients with MDD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".