MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047434078 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-b14

Abstract B14: Pinpointing the origins of pediatric brain tumors using single-cell transcriptomic analysis

2020· article· en· W3047434078 on OpenAlexaffabout
Selin Jessa, Alexis Blanchet-Cohen, Brian Krug, Maria Vladoiu, Marie Coutelier, Damien Faury, Brice Poreau, Nicolas Jay, W. Todd Farmer, Yixing Hu, Steven Hébert, Jean Monlong, Keith K. Murai, Melissa K. McConechy, Guillaume Bourque, Jiannis Ragoussis, Livia Garzia, Michael D. Taylor, Nada Jabado, Claudia L. Kleinman

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicChromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityHospital for Sick ChildrenMcGill University Health CentreJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTranscriptomeMedulloblastomaWnt signaling pathwayCell typeForebrainCarcinogenesisEmbryonic stem cellCellCancer researchNeuroscienceGeneticsGeneCentral nervous systemGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Childhood tumors of the central nervous system are deadly diseases, and for many tumor types outcome has not improved over the last three decades. Current evidence supports a model in which genetic alterations drive changes in neurodevelopmental gene expression programs, leading to oncogenesis postnatally. We hypothesize that there are specific cellular states during normal brain development that are vulnerable targets for oncogenic mutations. However, comprehensive developmental data for many brain regions relevant to pediatric brain tumors (PBT) are lacking. Here, we leverage single-cell RNA-sequencing to generate a reference transcriptome atlas of the developing brain in two regions where PBT commonly arise, the forebrain and the pons. We profile >65,000 cells from healthy embryonic and neonatal mouse and human specimens, and characterize cellular diversity, dynamics related to differentiation, and transcription factor regulatory activity. We use a novel strategy to project bulk RNA-seq profiles for a cohort of 200 PBT onto these cell types. We show that this projection stratifies tumors by type, and for several PBT subtypes, we identify their closest transcriptional match among the cell populations of the normal developing brain. WNT-subtype medulloblastoma matches the lower rhombic-lip derived mossy fiber neuron lineage. In embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes, we identify prenatal neurogenic radial glial cells as candidate cells of origin, while Group 2a/b atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors originate outside the neuro-ectoderm. Finally, single-cell profiling of patient tumor samples shows that these tumors mimic the transcriptional programs of their corresponding normal lineages and contain a mixture of cells with varying degrees of differentiation. We identify impaired differentiation of specific neural progenitors as a common oncogenic mechanism underlying PBT, and further demonstrate that this differentiation blockade may be reversible. Our findings thus provide a rational framework to guide future modeling and therapeutics. More broadly, we assemble a high-resolution developmental dataset, a valuable resource for the study of neuroscience and many brain pathologies. Citation Format: Selin Jessa, Alexis Blanchet-Cohen, Brian Krug, Maria C. Vladoiu, Marie Coutelier, Damien Faury, Brice Poreau, Nicolas De Jay, W. Todd Farmer, Yixing Hu, Steven Hébert, Jean Monlong, Keith K. Murai, Melissa McConechy, Guillaume Bourque, Jiannis Ragoussis, Livia Garzia, Michael D. Taylor, Nada Jabado, Claudia L. Kleinman. Pinpointing the origins of pediatric brain tumors using single-cell transcriptomic analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B14.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicChromatin Remodeling and CancerFrench-language works237,207