MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3047663541 · doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0321

Demonstration of biaxially tensile‐strained Ge/SiGe multiple quantum well (MQW) electroabsorption modulators with low polarization dependence

2018· article· en· W3047663541 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Jianfeng Gao, Junqiang Sun, Jialin Jiang, Yi Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueNanophotonics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersWuhan National Laboratory for OptoelectronicsNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaCollege of Family Physicians of Canada
KeywordsPolarizerMaterials sciencePolarization (electrochemistry)OptoelectronicsWaveguideUltimate tensile strengthTensile strainOpticsQuantum dotBirefringenceComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We demonstrate a novel biaxially tensile‐strained Ge/SiGe multiple quantum well (MQW) electroabsorption modulator with low polarization dependence. The device is waveguide integrated and has a length of 900 μm. Suspended microbridge structure is utilized to introduce biaxial tensile strain to the Ge/Si 0.19 Ge 0.81 MQWs. Light is coupled into and out of the waveguide through deeply etched facets at the ends of the waveguide. Both TE and TM polarized electroabsorption contrast ratios are tested by the use of polarization maintaining focusing lensed fiber and a linear polarizer. A polarization irrelevant contrast ratio of 4.3 dB is achieved under 0 V/2 V operation. Both simulations and experiments indicate that the demonstrated device has potential in waveguide integrated utilizations that have high requirements on polarization uniformity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.630
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNanophotonicsSame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207