MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3048148439 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.pedca19-b37

Abstract B37: Menin and EWS/FLI1 activate serine biosynthesis via ATF4 in Ewing sarcoma

2020· article· en· W3048148439 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jennifer A. Jiménez, Ramón Ocádiz-Ruiz, April A. Apfelbaum, Abhijay Kumar, Samuel A. Kerk, Jolanta Grembecka, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Elizabeth R. Lawlor

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGene knockdownCancer researchFLI1Transcription factorBiologyATF4OncogeneCancerGeneticsGeneCell cycle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Ewing sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive bone and soft-tissue tumor, most commonly driven by the EWS/FLI1 fusion oncogene. Previous work has revealed that the scaffolding protein menin functions to promote ES tumorgenicity. Additionally, our recent studies revealed a previously undescribed role for menin in the activation of the serine biosynthetic pathway (SSP), a critical metabolic pathway that is aberrantly activated in many human cancers. The transcription factor ATF4 has been identified in other tumor types as a master transcriptional regulator of the SSP. Furthermore, regulation of the SSP by EWS/FLI1 has been described, although the mechanism of this regulation remains unknown. The biologic functions of menin are largely determined by its protein-binding partners, the best characterized of which is MLL in epigenetic trithorax complexes. In the current study, we are investigating the mechanistic link between menin, EWS/FLI1, and SSP hyperactivation to test the hypothesis that, in the context of ES, these transcriptional regulators cooperate to promote metabolic reprogramming via ATF4. Through gain- and loss-of-function studies, our results show that ATF4 regulates the SSP in ES cells, and that loss of ATF4 impairs ES cell proliferation. Additionally, both pharmacologic inhibition with the menin:MLL interaction inhibitor, MI-503, and doxycycline-inducible shRNA knockdown of menin lead to loss of ATF4, coincident with loss of SSP expression. Knockdown of EWS/FLI1 similarly results in loss of both ATF4 and SSP expression. Interrogation of publicly available ChIP-seq data further shows enrichment for EWS/FLI1 binding at the ATF4 gene promoter that is lost with EWS/FLI1 knockdown, and ChIP-qPCR shows menin binding at the ATF4 gene promoter in association with H3K4me3 enrichment. ChIP-qPCR also shows enrichment of ATF4 binding at SSP gene promoters, which is diminished upon menin inhibition with MI-503. Preliminary studies suggest that ATF4 overexpression may rescue the effects of menin loss of function on the SSP. Together these findings support the hypothesis that menin hijacks the SSP via aberrant activation of ATF4, and that this depends on cooperation with EWS/FLI1. Ongoing studies are assessing whether this is mediated by trithorax-dependent or -independent functions of menin. Citation Format: Jennifer A. Jiménez, Ramon Ocadiz Ruiz, April Apfelbaum, Abhijay Kumar, Samuel Kerk, Jolanta Grembecka, Costas A. Lyssiotis, Elizabeth R. Lawlor. Menin and EWS/FLI1 activate serine biosynthesis via ATF4 in Ewing sarcoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on the Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research; 2019 Sep 17-20; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(14 Suppl):Abstract nr B37.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→