MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3049137390 · doi:10.1093/brain/awaa214

Lack of evidence for genetic association of saposins A, B, C and D with Parkinson’s disease

2020· letter· en· W3049137390 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuri L. Sosero, Sara Bandrés‐Ciga, Sharon Hassin‐Baer, Roy N. Alcalay, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundParkinson CanadaNational Institute on AgingConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementMcGill UniversityParkinson's FoundationBrookdale FoundationFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseGenetic associationDiseaseGeneticsGenome-wide association studyBiologyLocus (genetics)GeneGenotypeMedicineInternal medicineSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The PSAP gene encodes prosaposin, which is later cleaved into four active saposins: saposin A, B, C and D. Mutations in these enzymes have been linked to specific lysosomal storage disorders. Recently, a genetic association between mutations in saposin D and Parkinson’s disease (PD) has been reported. To further examine whether variants in saposin D or the other saposins could be associated with Parkinson’s disease, we performed Optimized Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT-O) in 4,132 Parkinson’s disease patients and 4,470 controls. Furthermore, we analyzed data from a PD Genome Wide Association Study (GWAS) to examine the association of common variants in the PSAP locus with Parkinson’s disease risk (analysis on 56,308 patients) and age at onset (analysis on 28,568 patients). We did not find any statistically significant associations between neither rare nor common variants in saposin D, nor any of the other saposins, and PD risk or onset. These results suggest that PSAP variants play either a very minor role, or more likely, no role, in PD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicLysosomal Storage Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207