MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3090962659 · doi:10.12688/aasopenres.13144.1

Developing excellence in biostatistics leadership, training and science in Africa: How the Sub-Saharan Africa Consortium for Advanced Biostatistics (SSACAB) training unites expertise to deliver excellence

2020· preprint· en· W3090962659 on OpenAlexaff
Tobias Chirwa, Zvifadzo Matsena Zingoni, Pascalia Munyewende, Samuel Manda, Henry Mwambi, Ngianga‐Bakwin Kandala, Samson Kinyanjui, Taryn Young, Eustasius Musenge, Jupiter Simbeye, Patrick Musonda, Michael Johnson Mahande, Patrick Weke, Nelson Owuor Onyango, Lawrence N. Kazembe, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Khangelani Zuma, Nonhlanhla Yende‐Zuma, Marie-Claire Omanyondo Ohambe, Emmanuel Kweku Nakua, Innocent Maposa, Birhanu Ayele, Thomas Achia, Rhoderick Machekano, Lehana Thabane, Jonathan Levin, Marinus J.C. Eijkemans, James R. Carpenter, Charles Chasela, Kerstin Klipstein‐Grobusch, Jim Todd

Bibliographic record

VenueAAS Open Research · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth and Medical Research Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpact
FundersAlliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in AfricaAfrican Academy of SciencesNew Partnership for Africa's DevelopmentDepartment for International Development, UK GovernmentWellcome TrustGlaxoSmithKline
KeywordsBiostatisticsExcellenceAccreditationMedical educationCapacity buildingPolitical sciencePublic healthMedicineLibrary scienceNursingComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The increase in health research in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has led to a high demand for biostatisticians to develop study designs, contribute and apply statistical methods in data analyses. Initiatives exist to address the dearth in statistical capacity and lack of local biostatisticians in SSA health projects. The Sub-Saharan African Consortium for Advanced Biostatistics (SSACAB) led by African institutions was initiated to improve biostatistical capacity according to the needs identified by African institutions, through collaborative masters and doctoral training in biostatistics. SACCAB has created a critical mass of biostatisticians and a network of institutions over the last five years and has strengthened biostatistics resources and capacity for health research studies in SSA. SSACAB comprises 11 universities and four research institutions which are supported by four European universities. In 2015, only four universities had established Masters programmes in biostatistics and SSACAB supported the remaining seven to develop Masters programmes. In 2019 the University of the Witwatersrand became the first African institution to gain Royal Statistical Society accreditation for a Biostatistics Masters programme. A total of 150 fellows have been awarded scholarships to date of which 123 are Masters fellowships (41 female) of whom 58 have already graduated. Graduates have been employed in African academic (19) and research (15) institutions and 10 have enrolled for PhD studies. A total of 27 (10 female) PhD fellowships have been awarded; 4 of them are due to graduate by 2020. To date, SSACAB Masters and PhD students have published 17 and 31 peer-reviewed articles, respectively. SSACAB has also facilitated well-attended conferences, face-to-face and online short courses. Pooling of limited biostatistics resources in SSA combined with co-funding from external partners has shown to be an effective strategy for the development and teaching of advanced biostatistics methods, supervision and mentoring of PhD candidates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.178
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.178
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.753
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAS Open ResearchSame topicHealth and Medical Research ImpactsFrench-language works237,207