The relationship between protein domains and homopeptides in the <i>Plasmodium falciparum</i> proteome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proteome of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum is notable for the pervasive occurrence of homopeptides or low-complexity regions (i.e., regions that are made from a small subset of amino-acid residue types). The most prevalent of these are made from residues encoded by adenine/thymidine (AT)-rich codons, in particular asparagine. We examined homopeptide occurrences within protein domains in P. falciparum . Homopeptide enrichments occur for hydrophobic (e.g., valine), or small residues (alanine or glycine) in short spans (<5 residues), but these enrichments disappear for longer lengths. We observe that short asparagine homopeptides (<10 residues long) have a dramatic relative depletion inside protein domains, indicating some selective constraint to keep them from forming. We surmise that this is possibly linked to co-translational protein folding, although there are specific protein domains that are enriched in longer asparagine homopeptides (≥10 residues) indicating a functional linkage for specific poly-asparagine tracts. Top gene ontology functional category enrichments for homopeptides associated with diverse protein domains include “vesicle-mediated transport”, and “DNA-directed 5′-3′ RNA polymerase activity”, with various categories linked to “binding” evidencing significant homopeptide depletions. Also, in general homopeptides are substantially enriched in the parts of protein domains that are near/in IDRs. The implications of these findings are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".