MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092180222 · doi:10.1101/2020.10.08.332551

Humans surviving cholera develop antibodies against <i>Vibrio cholerae</i> O-specific polysaccharide that inhibit pathogen motility

2020· preprint· en· W3092180222 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Richelle C. Charles, Meagan Kelly, Jenny M. Tam, Aklima Akter, Motaher Hossain, Kamrul Islam, Rajib Biswas, Mohammad Kamruzzaman, Fahima Chowdhury, Ashraful Islam Khan, Daniel T. Leung, Ana A. Weil, Regina C. LaRocque, Taufiqur Rahman Bhuiyan, Atiqur Rahman, Leslie M. Mayo-Smith, Rachel L. Becker, Jatin M. Vyas, Christina S. Faherty, Kourtney P. Nickerson, Samantha R. Giffen, Alaina S Ritter, Matthew K. Waldor, Peng Xu, Pavol Kováč, Stephen B. Calderwood, Robert C. Kauffman, Jens Wrammert, Firdausi Qadri, Jason B. Harris, Edward T. Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVibrio bacteria research studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of HealthFogarty International CenterInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, BangladeshStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesGlobal Affairs CanadaRobert Wood Johnson Foundation
KeywordsVibrio choleraePolyclonal antibodiesMicrobiologyCholeraBiologyAntibodyMotilityCholera toxinFlagellinVibrionaceaeEl TorPathogenBacteriaImmunologyCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The mechanism of protection against cholera afforded by previous illness or vaccination is currently unknown. We have recently shown that antibodies targeting O-specific polysaccharide (OSP) of Vibrio cholerae correlate highly with protection against cholera. V. cholerae is highly motile and possesses a flagellum sheathed in O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and motility of V. cholerae correlates with virulence. Using high speed video microscopy, and building upon previous animal-related work, we demonstrate that sera, polyclonal antibody fractions, and OSP-specific monoclonal antibodies recovered from humans surviving cholera block V. cholerae motility at both subagglutinating and agglutinating concentrations. This anti-motility effect is reversed by pre-adsorbing sera and polyclonal antibody fractions with purified OSP; and is associated with OSP-specific but not flagellin-specific monoclonal antibodies. F[ab] fragments of OSP-specific polyclonal antibodies do not inhibit motility, suggesting a requirement for antibody-mediated crosslinking in motility inhibition. We show that OSP-specific antibodies do not directly affect V. cholerae viability, but that OSP-specific monoclonal antibody highly protects against death in the murine cholera model. We used in vivo competitive index studies to demonstrate that OSP-specific antibodies impede colonization and survival of V. cholerae in intestinal tissues, and that this impact is motility-dependent. Our findings suggest that the impedance of motility by antibodies targeting V. cholerae OSP contributes to protection against cholera. IMPORTANCE Cholera is a severe dehydrating illness of humans caused by Vibrio cholerae. V. cholerae is a highly motile bacterium that has a single flagellum covered in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) displaying O-specific polysaccharide (OSP), and V. cholerae motility correlates with its ability to cause disease. The mechanisms of protection against cholera are not well understood; however, since V. cholerae is a non-invasive intestinal pathogen, it is likely that antibodies that bind the pathogen or its products in the intestinal lumen contribute to protection from infection. Here, we demonstrate that OSP-specific antibodies isolated from humans surviving cholera in Bangladesh inhibit V. cholerae motility and are associated with protection against challenge in a motility-dependent manner.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicVibrio bacteria research studiesFrench-language works237,207