MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092862621

Le contexte, les partenaires et le processus : les contraintes éthiques dans les recherches collaboratives

2020· article· fr· W3092862621 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Marc Larouche, Jean-Louis Genard, Marta Roca i Escoda, Pablo Díaz

Bibliographic record

VenueSERVAL (Université de Lausanne) · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis le 19ème congrès de l’Association internationale des sociologues de langue française (AISLF) à Rabat (2012), une session consacrée à la sociologie locale est désormais intégrée à la programmation des congrès de l’AISLF. À Rabat, dans la foulée des Printemps arabes, il importait pour nos collègues issus de ces sociétés de Penser la démocratie dans les sociétés arabes ; à Montréal (2016), il s’agissait de présenter et interroger une pratique de recherche bien ancrée au Québec et au Cana...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.472
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.407
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4720.407
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0320.088
Scholarly communication0.0450.042
Open science0.0070.026
Research integrity0.0160.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSERVAL (Université de Lausanne)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207