MECHANISMS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY: Pioneer transcription factors in pituitary development and tumorigenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pioneer transcription factors have key roles in development as master regulators of cell fate specification. Only a small fraction of all transcription factors have the pioneer ability that confers access to target genomic DNA sites embedded in so-called 'closed' heterochromatin. This ability to seek and bind target sites within the silenced portion of the epigenome is the basis for their role in changing cell fate. Upon binding heterochromatin sites, pioneer factors trigger remodeling of chromatin from a repressed into an active organization. This action is typically exerted at enhancer regulatory sequences, thus allowing activation of new gene subsets. During pituitary development, the only pioneer with a well-documented role is Pax7 that specifies the intermediate lobe melanotrope cell fate. In this review, a particular focus is placed on this Pax7 function but its properties are also considered within the general context of pioneer factor action. Given their potent activity to reprogram gene expression, it is not surprising that many pioneers are associated with tumor development. Overexpression or chromosomal translocations leading to the production of chimeric pioneers have been implicated in different cancers. We review here the current knowledge on the mechanism of pioneer factor action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".