MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093741845 · doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0521

Cyclic epidemics and extreme outbreaks induced by hydro-climatic variability and memory

2020· article· en· W3093741845 on OpenAlexaff
Milad Hooshyar, Caroline E. Wagner, Rachel E. Baker, C. Jessica E. Metcalf, Bryan T. Grenfell, Amilcare Porporato

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Royal Society Interface · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakTransmission (telecommunications)Environmental scienceLinearizationEpidemic modelTransmission rateNonlinear systemEcologyMeteorologyBiologyComputer scienceGeographyPhysicsVirologyEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A minimalist model of ecohydrologic dynamics is coupled to the well-known susceptible–infected–recovered epidemiological model to explore hydro-climatic controls on infection dynamics and extreme outbreaks. The resulting HYSIR model reveals the existence of a noise-induced bifurcation producing oscillations in infection dynamics. Linearization of the governing equations allows for an analytic expression for the periodicity of infections in terms of both epidemiological (e.g. transmission and recovery rate) and hydrologic (i.e. soil moisture decay rate or memory) parameters. Numerical simulations of the full stochastic, nonlinear system show extreme outbreaks in response to particular combinations of hydro-climatic conditions, neither of which is extreme per se , rather than a single major climatic event. These combinations depend on the assumed functional relationship between the hydrologic variables and the transmission rate. Our results emphasize the importance of hydro-climatic history and system memory in evaluating the risk of severe outbreaks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.881
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Royal Society InterfaceSame topicMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsFrench-language works237,207