MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

S1126 Safety and Efficacy of Switching to Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF) in Virally Suppressed Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) Patients With Hepatic Impairment: Week 48 Results From a Phase 2 Open Label Study

2020· article· en· W3093945819 on OpenAlexaff
Ho Bae, Young‐Suk Lim, Huy N. Trinh, Jeong Heo, Wan‐Long Chuang, Aric J. Hui, Magdy Elkhashab, Susanna K. Tan, Shuyuan Mo, Matthew Guion, Belinda Jump, John F. Flaherty, Vithika Suri, Anuj Gaggar, Tak Yin Owen Tsang, Pietro Andreoné, Harry L.A. Janssen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis B Virus Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalToronto Liver Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTenofovir alafenamideEntecavirInternal medicineHBeAgGastroenterologyRenal functionCreatinineHepatitis BAdverse effectHepatitis B virusHBsAgViral loadLamivudineImmunologyVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Switching to TAF, a novel tenofovir prodrug, has shown maintenance of viral suppression with stable or improved bone and renal safety at Week 24 in CHB patients with impaired hepatic function. Here we evaluated the efficacy and safety 48 weeks after CHB patients with hepatic decompensation were switched to TAF. METHODS: In this Phase 2 study (NCT03180619) patients with CHB having a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score ≥ 7 and ≤ 12 at screening, or by documented history, receiving TDF and/or other OAVs for ≥ 48 weeks, with HBV DNA < LLOQ for ≥ 24 weeks and < 20 IU/mL at screening were eligible to participate. All patients were switched to TAF 25 mg QD and were to be treated for 96 weeks. Safety assessments including changes in bone (hip and spine BMD) and renal (CrCl by Cockcroft-Gault [eGFRCG], serum creatinine) parameters, viral suppression, and biochemical responses were assessed at Week 48. RESULTS: 31 patients were enrolled at 18 sites in 7 countries and 90% completed 48 weeks of treatment. At baseline, 74% were ≥ 50 y, 68% male, 81% Asian, 90% HBeAg-negative, with median fibrotest (FT) score 0.81, median CTP and MELD scores of 6 and 10, respectively, median eGFRCG 98 mL/min, and 19% and had osteoporosis by T score at spine. Prior use of TDF and entecavir was reported by 68% and 45%, respectively. Key efficacy/safety results at Week 48 are summarized in the Table. By missing equals failure analysis, 31 patients (100%) had HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL, 81% had normal ALT and CTP/MELD scores were stable. After switching to TAF in this population with liver impairment, CTP, MELD, and FT scores were unchanged while bone and renal parameters were stable. TAF was well tolerated with few having Grade 3 or 4 AEs (4 patients); no serious AEs related to study drug, and 1 patient who discontinued for worsening renal function unrelated to TAF. CONCLUSION: CHB patients with hepatic impairment who were switched to TAF from TDF or other OAV showed high rates of viral suppression, normal ALT and bone and renal safety were stable at Week 48.Table 1.: Efficacy and Safety Results at Week 48

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicHepatitis B Virus StudiesFrench-language works237,207