MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094592496 · doi:10.1111/cea.13765

INEXAS: A Phase 2 Randomized Trial of On‐demand Inhaled Interferon Beta‐1a in Severe Asthmatics

2020· article· en· W3094592496 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Christopher McCrae, Marita Olsson, Per Gustafson, Anna Malmgren, Malin Aurell, Malin Fagerås, Carla A. Da Silva, Anders Cavallin, Jonathan Paraskos, Karin Karlsson, Cecilia Wingren, Phillip Monk, Richard Marsden, Tim Harrison

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical & Experimental Allergy · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAstraZeneca CanadaAstraZeneca
KeywordsMedicineAsthmaPlaceboExacerbationInternal medicineRandomized controlled trialSputumClinical endpointRespiratory tract infectionsInhalationInterim analysisImmunologyAnesthesiaRespiratory systemTuberculosisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) are important triggers for asthma exacerbations. We hypothesized that inhalation of the anti‐viral cytokine, interferon (IFN)‐β, during URTI, could prevent these exacerbations. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of on‐demand inhaled IFN‐β1a (AZD9412) to prevent severe asthma exacerbations following symptomatic URTI. Methods This was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial in which patients with severe asthma (GINA 4‐5; n = 121) reporting URTI symptoms were randomized to 14 days of once‐daily nebulized AZD9412 or placebo. The primary endpoint was severe exacerbations during treatment. Secondary endpoints included 6‐item asthma control questionnaire (ACQ‐6) and lung function. Exploratory biomarkers included IFN‐response markers in serum and sputum, blood leucocyte counts and serum inflammatory cytokines. Results Following a pre‐planned interim analysis, the trial was terminated early due to an unexpectedly low exacerbation rate. Asthma worsenings were generally mild and tended to peak at randomization, possibly contributing to the lack of benefit of AZD9412 on other asthma endpoints. Numerically, AZD9412 did not reduce severe exacerbation rate, ACQ‐6, asthma symptom scores or reliever medication use. AZD9412 improved lung function (morning peak expiratory flow; mPEF) by 19.7 L/min. Exploratory post hoc analyses indicated a greater mPEF improvement by AZD9412 in patients with high blood eosinophils (>0.3 × 10 9 /L) at screening and low serum interleukin‐18 relative change at pre‐treatment baseline. Pharmacodynamic effect of AZD9412 was confirmed using IFN‐response markers. Conclusions & Clinical Relevance Colds did not have the impact on asthma patients that was expected and, due to the low exacerbation rate, the trial was stopped early. On‐demand AZD9412 treatment did not numerically reduce the number of exacerbations, but did attenuate URTI‐induced worsening of mPEF. Severe asthma patients with high blood eosinophils or low serum interleukin‐18 response are potential subgroups for further investigation of inhaled IFN‐β1a.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.859

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.405
Teacher spread0.344 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical & Experimental AllergySame topicAsthma and respiratory diseasesFrench-language works237,207