Fiirst-2: Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Administration of Clotting Factor Concentrates with Standard Massive Hemorrhage Protocol in Severely Bleeding Trauma Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Acute trauma coagulopathy (ATC) is associated with severe hemorrhage. ATC etiology is often multifactorial, with acquired fibrinogen deficiency and consumption of clotting factors recognized as major factors. The FiiRST-2 study will determine the impact of early co-administration of fibrinogen concentrate (FC) and prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) on the total number of allogeneic blood products (ABPs) transfused compared to the current standard of care (ratio-based plasma resuscitation). Methods: FiiRST-2 is a multicenter (8 Canadian centers), pragmatic, randomized, parallel-control, superiority trial with a two-armed, two-stage design with an adaptive interim analysis. Research ethics board approval has been obtained and the study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Trauma patients >16 years old at risk of massive hemorrhage will be randomized to receive FC + PCC or standard of care (ratio-based plasma resuscitation + FC in response to low fibrinogen levels) (Table 1) until all units in the second massive hemorrhage protocol (MHP) pack have been administered, or earlier if the MHP is terminated. The primary endpoint is to demonstrate superiority with respect to the number of ABP units (RBCs [red blood cells] + plasma + platelets) transfused within 24 hours of arrival at the trauma bay/emergency department. Secondary endpoints include RBC units transfused within 24 hours, incidence of thromboembolic events, and ventilator-free days up to Day 28. Safety endpoints include all adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) up to Day 28. It is projected to enroll 360 patients depending on the results of the Interim analysis. Results: An interim analysis will be performed after 120 patients have completed the study. The study is expected to start late 2020 and enrollment is expected to require about 2 years. Conclusions: FiiRST-2 will determine if early hemostatic therapy with FC + PCC is superior to standard MHP packs in bleeding trauma patients. Results could have a major impact on clinical practice and improve management and outcomes in this high-risk group of patients. Disclosures Da Luz: Octapharma Canada: Research Funding. Callum:Octapharma: Research Funding; Canadian Blood Services: Research Funding. Schwartz:Octapharma: Current Employment. Karkouti:Canadian blood services: Research Funding; Octapharma: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: PCC and fibrinogen concentrate for acquired coagulopathic bleeding (off-label in the USA)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".