MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

379 Initial safety, efficacy, and product attributes from the SURPASS trial with ADP-A2M4CD8, a SPEAR T-cell therapy incorporating an affinity optimized TCR targeting MAGE-A4 and a CD8α co-receptor

2020· article· en· W3100538981 on OpenAlexaff
David S. Hong, Jeffrey Clarke, Tanner M. Johanns, Partow Kebriaei, John V. Heymach, Ahmed Galal, Samuel D. Saibil, Adrian G. Sacher, Francine Brophy, Gareth Betts, Natalie Bath, William Spinner, Alex J. Tipping, Jessica Tucci, Raymond Luke, Trupti Trivedi, Quan Lin, Jean‐Marc Navenot, Paula M. Fracasso, Karen Miller, Elliot Norry, Mark E. Dudley, Marcus O. Butler

Bibliographic record

VenueRegular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCD8MedicineT-cell receptorInternal medicineAntigenCancerT cellGastroenterologyOncologyImmunologyImmune system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> The ongoing SURPASS trial (NCT04044859) evaluates safety and efficacy of next-generation ADP-A2M4CD8 SPEAR T-cells co-expressing the CD8α co-receptor with the engineered MAGE-A4<sup>c1032</sup>T cell receptor (TCR). <h3>Methods</h3> First-in-human trial in HLA-A*02 positive patients (pts) with advanced cancers expressing MAGE-A4 antigen by immunohistochemistry. Eligible pts undergo apheresis, T-cells are isolated, transduced with a Lentiviral vector containing the MAGE-A4<sup>c1032</sup> TCR and CD8α co receptor, and expanded. Expansion, transduction level, cellular composition and function of the manufactured product (MP) are assessed in vitro. Prior to infusion, pts receive lymphodepletion with fludarabine 30 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day for 4 days and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day for 3 days. <h3>Results</h3> As of 16 July 2020, 5 pts (1 with MRCLS, 2 with esophagogastric junction [EGJ] cancers, 1 with ovarian cancer, and 1 with head and neck cancer) were treated with ADP-A2M4 CD8 (range ~1 to 5.7 billion transduced cells). No DLTs or SAEs have been reported. To date, 1 pt with EGJ cancer had a partial response (PR per RECIST) and has had progression-free survival &gt;6 months. One pt with head and neck cancer also had a PR. All other pts have had best overall response of stable disease.MP expanded by an average of 15.3 fold during manufacturing (range 5.9 to 25.6-fold). On average, 43% of T-cells in the MP expressed the TCR (range 23 to 63%). The fraction of CD4<sup>+</sup> cells in the final MP varied (range 45 to 84%). Co-expression of the MAGE-A4 TCR and CD8α in CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cells in the patient MP enabled CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cells to kill tumor target cells directly in vitro. MAGE-A4 expression in tumor biopsies varied (H-score range 55 to 300). Transduced T-cells were detected in peripheral blood of all pts. IFN-gamma increased transiently in the serum of 1 pt who responded. <h3>Conclusions</h3> ADP-A2M4CD8 SPEAR T-cells have shown an acceptable safety profile and pts with EGJ cancer and head and neck cancer have demonstrated evidence of antitumor activity. Translational data and early clinical results indicate that co-expression of the CD8α co-receptor on CD4<sup>+</sup> SPEAR T-cells may increase the potency of the product by conferring additional killing activity to the helper T-cell subset. This dose escalation trial is ongoing and updated clinical and translational data will be presented. <h3>Trial Registration</h3> NCT04044859 <h3>Ethics Approval</h3> The trial was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization Good Clinical Practice guidelines and was approved by local authorities. An independent ethics committee or institutional review board approved the clinical protocol at each participating center. All the patients provided written informed consent before study entry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRegular and Young Investigator Award AbstractsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207