MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Fostering global data sharing: highlighting the recommendations of the Research Data Alliance COVID-19 working group

2021· preprint· en· W3105389930 on OpenAlexafffund
Claire C. Austin, Alexander Bernier, Louise Bezuidenhout, Juan Bicarregui, Timea Biro, Anne Cambon‐Thomsen, Stephanie Russo Carroll, Zoe Cournia, Piotr Wojciech Dąbrowski, Gayo Diallo, Thomas Duflot, Leyla Jael Castro, Sandra Gesing, Alejandra González-Beltrán, Anupama E. Gururaj, Natalie Harrower, Dawei Lin, Cláudia Bauzer Medeiros, Eva Méndez, Natalie Meyers, Daniel Mietchen, Rajini Nagrani, Gustav Nilsonne, Simon Parker, Brian Pickering, Amy Pienta, Panayiota Polydoratou, Fotis Psomopoulos, Stéphanie Rennes, Robyn Rowe, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone, Hugh Shanahan, Lina Sitz, Joanne Stocks, Marcos Roberto Tovani‐Palone, Mary Uhlmansiek

Bibliographic record

VenueWellcome Open Research · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityLaurentian UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilUniversité de BordeauxHorizon 2020Rural Development AdministrationEuropean CommissionAgence Universitaire de la FrancophonieWellcome TrustFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São PauloNational Institute on Drug AbuseUniversity of MichiganNational Science Foundation
KeywordsData sharingPreparednessInteroperabilityMedical researchMetadataKnowledge managementPolitical sciencePublic relationsData scienceMedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide WebAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmaOpen science
Domain: not available · Genre: Empirical
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptMetaresearchOpen scienceScholarly communication
Domain: Reproducibility · Genre: Commentary
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.537
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.491
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.571

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.5370.491
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.006
Bibliometrics0.0100.011
Science and technology studies0.0150.044
Scholarly communication0.0650.083
Open science0.0160.056
Research integrity0.0450.075
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.803
GPT teacher head0.591
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

Open scienceMetaresearchScholarly communication

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReproducibility
GenreEmpirical · Commentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWellcome Open Research→Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI→CategoryOpen science→French-language works237,207→