MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3107805681 · doi:10.5812/gct.110381

The Expression of Wnt5a Gene Throughout Definitive Endoderm Induction Process in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

2020· article· en· W3107805681 on OpenAlexaff
Shahrokh Lorzadeh, Negar Azarpira, Saeid Ghavami, Leila Kohan

Bibliographic record

VenueGene Cell and Tissue · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndodermHomeobox protein NANOGEctodermBiologyEmbryoid bodyWnt signaling pathwayInduced pluripotent stem cellFOXA2Cell biologyMesodermWNT5AGerm layerCellular differentiationStem cellEmbryonic stem cellMolecular biologyEmbryogenesisGeneticsEmbryoGeneSignal transduction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the ability to proliferate indefinitely and differentiate into three germ layers of ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Definitive induction is the first and the most delicate stage of differentiation of various iPSC-derived organs. It has been found that the Wnt signaling pathway implicates in embryogenesis, organogenesis, and cell communication. Objectives: In the present study, we aimed to investigate the expression pattern of the Wnt5a gene as an indicator of non-canonical Wnt signaling activity during definitive endoderm induction of iPSCs. Methods: Human iPSCs (RSCB0042) were acquired from Royan stem cell bank of Royan Institute (Tehran, Iran). The iPSCs were cultured on a feeder layer of mitomycin-inactivated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF), and iPSC colonies were collected for embryoid body (EB) generation by suspension culture method. Then endoderm induction step was performed using a series of small molecules. The quantitative real-time PCR was used to assess the mRNA expression of wnt5a, Nanog, OCT4, SOX17, and FOXA2 genes. Results: The production of efficient EBs confirmed by a decrease in Nanog and Oct4 gene expression and the success of DE (definite endoderm) induction step was confirmed by a high expression level of DE specific genes, Sox17, and FoxA2. A significant upregulation of Wnt5a in EB samples and a minor decrease at day 4 was observed. However, the differentiation process followed by an incremental fashion in Wnt5a mRNA expression starting from day 4 of differentiation among the samples of days 6 and 8 (DE stage). Conclusions: Our results suggest that Wnt5a is more activated at the later steps of endoderm induction rather than the early steps, which may be due to the stimulation of canonical Wnt signaling. Finding the expression level of Wnt5a could rise insights for developing more efficient differentiation induction protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.506

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGene Cell and TissueSame topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207