MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Peer Review #2 of "Early abolition of cough reflex predicts mortality in deeply sedated brain-injured patients (v0.1)"

2020· peer-review· en· W3108040574 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Kondziella

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepeer-review
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory and Cough-Related Research
Canadian institutionsRoyal Victoria HospitalMcGill University
FundersPolitecnico di Torino
KeywordsMedicineReflexAnesthesiaCough reflexPediatricsAudiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Deep sedation may hamper the detection of neurological deterioration in brain-injured patients.Impaired brainstem reflexes within the first 24 hours of deep sedation are associated with increased mortality in non-brain-injured patients.Our objective was to confirm this association in brain-injured patients.Methods:This was an observational prospective multicenter cohort study involving four neurointensive care units.We included acute brain-injured patients requiring deep sedation, defined by a Richmond Assessment Sedation Scale (RASS) < -3.Neurological assessment was performed at day 1 and included pupillary diameter, pupillary light, corneal and cough reflexes, and grimace and motor response to noxious stimuli.Pre-sedation Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS-II) were collected, as well as the cause of death in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU).Results: 137 brain-injured patients were recruited, including 70 (51%) traumatic brain-injured patients, 40 (29%) vascular (subarachnoid haemorrhage or intracerebral haemorrhage).Thirty patients (22%) died in

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.130
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Evaluation · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.130
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1840.093

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.414
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
DomainEvaluation
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRespiratory and Cough-Related ResearchFrench-language works237,207