Tip Position Control and Vibration Suppression of a Planar Two-Link Rigid-Flexible Underactuated Manipulator
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
When a flexible link manipulator lacks a joint motor, how to use the remaining motors to achieve the control objective is a challenge, and the research in this direction is limited. This article presents a tip position control and vibration suppression approach for a planar two-link rigid-flexible (TLRF) underactuated manipulator with a passive first joint. First, we establish a dynamic model of the system by using the assumed mode method (AMM) and the Lagrangian modeling method. Then, we obtain the dynamic coupling relationship of the two links based on the dynamic model. According to this dynamic coupling relationship, we find that the passive rigid link can be controlled indirectly by controlling the active flexible link. Thus, we calculate the target angles of the two links by using the inverse kinematic method and design a controller for the active flexible link to stabilize it at its target angle and to suppress its vibration. Next, we optimize the parameters of this controller by using the genetic algorithm (GA). GA helps us simultaneously stabilize the passive rigid link at its target angle while realizing the control objective of the active flexible link. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed control approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it