MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3110677243 · doi:10.1002/slct.202003893

Influence of C5‐Substituents on Repair of <i>O</i> <sup>4</sup> ‐Methyl Adducts of Pyrimidines by <i>O</i> <sup>6</sup> ‐Alkylguanine DNA Alkyltransferases

2020· article· en· W3110677243 on OpenAlexaff
Lauralicia Sacre, Alexander Pontarelli, Yehya Bahsoun, Christopher J. Wilds

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistrySelect · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrifluoromethylAdductDNAChemistryHalogenAlkylationStereochemistryNucleobaseDNA repairDeoxyguanosineThymidineMedicinal chemistryBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The DNA repair protein O 6 ‐alkylguanine‐DNA alkyltransferase (AGT), found in numerous organisms, can remove methyl groups from the O 6 ‐ and O 4 ‐atoms of 2′‐deoxyguanosine and thymidine in DNA. AGT variants demonstrate different repair efficiencies towards these lesions. To understand the influence of C5 nucleobase substituents on O 4 ‐methyl removal by AGTs, DNA duplexes containing 5‐chloro‐, 5‐bromo‐ 5‐iodo‐ and 5‐trifluoromethyl‐ O 4 ‐methyl‐2′‐deoxyuridine were studied. UV thermal denaturation revealed a stability reduction of 11 °C for the O 4 ‐methyl halogen series and 5‐trifluoromethyl analog relative to their controls. For the 5‐chloro analog efficient repair was observed by human and E.coli AGTs. For the larger halogens (5‐bromo and 5‐iodo) and 5‐trifluoromethyl analog, human AGT showed moderate repair of the O 4 ‐methyl adduct. E.coli OGT and Ada‐C readily repaired most adducts with reduced efficiency for the larger groups, except C5‐iodo. These results suggest electronic contributions and favourable interactions of the C5‐halogens within the AGT active site contribute to efficient dealkylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistrySelectSame topicDNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryFrench-language works237,207