ETMR-20. IMPACT OF HIGH DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH AND WITHOUT METHOTREXATE (MTX) ON OUTCOME OF PATIENTS WITH EMBRYONAL TUMORS WITH MULTI-LAYERED ROSETTES (ETMRs): A REPORT FROM CHILDREN’S ONCOLOGY GROUP PHASE III TRIAL ACNS0334
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Infant embryonal brain tumors comprise a spectrum of histologic and molecular entities including medulloblastoma (MB) and tumors collectively called CNS PNET’s, including supratentorial PNET (sPNET), pineoblastoma and other less common histologic entities. Non-MB embryonal tumors, historically considered high risk disease, were included in ACNS0334, A Children’s Oncology Group prospective phase III trial which compared efficacy of an induction regimen with and without methotrexate combined with high dose chemotherapy and stem cell rescue; no radiation was mandated. Molecular testing performed after ACNS0334 closure identified 14 patients with embryonal tumors with multi-layered rosettes (ETMRs), a new molecular entity previously classified under various diagnostic categories. ETMR patients made up 20% of the molecularly analyzed ACNS0334 cohort and were predominantly females. Tumors were largely non-metastatic (10/14 M0, 1 M1, 3 M2/M3) and originated in the cerebrum (8), cerebellum (3) and pineal gland (3). Gross total tumor resection was achieved in 5/11 patients with M0/M1 disease; 9/14 patients completed full treatment with 5 randomized to MTX induction and 9 to no-MTX. Five of 14 patients progressed on treatment, one had a toxic death. Disease progression was primarily local (88 %). No difference by methotrexate randomization was observed. Four patients are alive without progression 5–10+ years off therapy, none received radiation. No patients received radiation prior to progression. Four were irradiated after progression and died from disease within 3 to 13 months. Our study, a first report on ETMRs prospectively treated on a clinical trial, suggests high dose chemotherapy benefits a portion of ETMR patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".