Protective Effect of Edaravone against Cationic Lipid-Mediated Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liposomes containing ionizable cationic lipids have been widely used for the delivery of nucleic acids such as small-interfering RNA and mRNA. The utility of cationic lipids with a permanent positive charge, however, is limited to in vitro transfection of cultured cells due to its dose-limiting toxic side effects observed in animals. Several reports have suggested that the permanently charged cationic lipids induce reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-mediated toxicity in cells. We therefore hypothesized that the concomitant use of ROS inhibitor could reduce toxicity and improve drug efficacy. In this study, suppression of the cationic toxicity was evaluated using an ROS scavenger, edaravone, which is a low-molecular-weight antioxidant drug clinically approved for acute-phase cerebral infarction and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Cell viability assay in the mouse macrophage-like cell line RAW264 indicated that the concomitant use of edaravone were not able to suppress the cytotoxicity induced by cationic liposomes comprised of monovalent cationic lipid N-(1-[2,3-dioleyloxy]propyl)-N,N,N-trimethylammonium chloride (DOTMA) over a short period of time. Cationic lipids-induced necrosis was assumed to be involved in the cytotoxicity upon short-term exposure to cationic liposomes. On the other hand, the significant improvement of cell viability was observed when the short treatment with cationic liposomes was followed by exposure to edaravone for 24 h. It was also confirmed that apoptosis inhibition by ROS elimination might have contributed to this effect. These results suggest the utility of continuous administration with edaravone as concomitant drug for suppression of adverse reactions in therapeutic treatment using cationic liposomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".