MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3119363454 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200651

Managing conflicts of interest in the development of health guidelines

2021· article· en· W3119363454 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gregory Traversy, Lianne Barnieh, Elie A. Akl, G. Michael Allan, Melissa Brouwers, Isabelle Ganache, Quinn Grundy, Gordon Guyatt, Diane Kelsall, Gillian Leng, Ainsley Moore, Navindra Persaud, Holger J. Schünemann, Sharon E. Straus, Brett D. Thombs, Rachel Rodin, Marcello Tonelli

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoKellogg's (Canada)McMaster University Medical CentreUniversity of OttawaPublic Health Agency of CanadaSt. Michael's HospitalJewish General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryInstitut National d'Excellence en Santé et en Services SociauxUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKey (lock)Public healthPublic relationsConflict of interestPublic interestComputer sciencePolitical scienceMedicineData sciencePathologyComputer securityLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS Public awareness regarding the importance of disclosing and managing conflicts of interest (COIs) during the development of clinical practice and public health guidelines is growing, owing to recent high-profile news stories within and outside Canada.[1][1]–[9][2] Despite the existence

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.223
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.664
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Incentives · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.2230.664
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0190.011
Open science0.0050.011
Research integrity0.0160.032
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.629
GPT teacher head0.564
Teacher spread0.066 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainIncentives
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association JournalSame topicPharmaceutical industry and healthcareFrench-language works237,207