MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3120135554 · doi:10.1071/rdv33n2ab150

150 Changes in pyruvate metabolism alters the epigenetic and molecular maturation of bovine oocytes

2021· article· en· W3120135554 on OpenAlexaff
J. V. A. Silva, Jessica Ispada, Aldcejam Martins da Fonseca, Érika Cristina dos Santos, Camila Bruna de Lima, H. C. da Rocha, Marcella Pecora Milazzotto

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOocyteIn vitro maturationGlycolysisAndrologySodium pyruvateChemistryOogenesisEpigeneticsHistoneMetabolismBiochemistryBiologyCell biologyEmbryoMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During in vitro maturation (IVM), bovine oocytes undergo important metabolic, epigenetic, and transcriptional changes for the acquisition of developmental competence. Particularly, metabolic changes that alter the availability of cytoplasmic acetyl-CoA, the main substrate for histones acetylation, may alter the epigenetic profile of the oocyte, with consequences for correct molecular maturation. To test this hypothesis, cumulus–oocyte complexes (COCs) were IVM in three experimental groups: Control [IVM medium (TCM-199-Bicarbonate, 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 µg mL−1 oestradiol, 10 µg mL−1 FSH, and 10 µg mL−1 human chorionic gonadotrophin)], DCA (IVM medium supplemented with 1.5 mM sodium dichloroacetate, a pyruvate to acetyl-CoA conversion stimulator) and IA (IVM medium supplemented with 5 µM sodium iodoacetate, a glycolysis inhibitor). Cumulus cells (CC) and oocytes (Oo) were analysed separately at 24 h (mitochondrial activity, MA; MitoTracker Red CMXRos, ThermoFisher Scientific] and at 0, 4, 8, 16, and 24 h of IVM [lysine 9 histone 3 acetylation (H3K9ac immunofluorescence) and new transcript synthesis (only CC; Click-iT® RNA, ThermoFisher Scientific). The images were acquired using a fluorescence microscope and analysed by Image J software. The results from at least 3 replicates were compared by Student’s t-test (treatment vs. control) or by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (comparison within the same group in different time points) considering P < 0.05. As expected, DCA treatment led to an increase in MA in CC and oocytes (CC control vs. DCA, P = 0.003; Oo control vs. DCA, P = 0.003). In CC, during the first 4 h, H3K9ac increased significantly in the treated group and decreased in the control group. At 8, 16, and 24 h, both groups presented similar tendencies, although H3K9ac levels remained higher in DCA compared with control at all time points (P < 0.001). The synthesis of new transcripts in CC was stimulated by DCA compared with control at 8 h (P = 0.02) and particularly at 16 h (P = 0.002), when acetylation levels were at the lowest point. Interestingly, in oocytes, the initial trend was reversed. An increase was observed in the H3K9ac levels of the control group (P = 0.014), whereas no difference was observed for DCA in the first 4 h. Moreover, although acetylation levels followed a downward tendency with time in both groups, oocytes treated with DCA showed lower H3K9ac levels at 4 and 8 h and a higher level at 24 h (P = 0.04) compared with control. Regarding IA, lower MA were verified in CC whereas oocytes had the opposite profile (CC control vs. IA: P = 0.0035; Oc control vs. IA: P < 0.001). In CC, this decrease in MA was not accompanied by a decrease in H3K9ac. In contrast, H3K9ac increased compared with the control group at 8 and 16 h (control 8 h vs. IA 8 h: P = 0.019 and control 16 h vs. IA 16 h: P = 0.019). These changes were accompanied by an increase in the synthesis of new transcripts in the IA group over the time of IVM. Based on these data, we can conclude that changes in pyruvate metabolism caused by manipulation of the IVM system lead to epigenetic and molecular changes in both CC and oocytes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score0.315

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207