MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3122241329 · doi:10.1002/etc.4985

Toxicity Screening of Bisphenol A Replacement Compounds: Cytotoxicity and mRNA Expression in Primary Hepatocytes of Chicken and Double-Crested Cormorant

2021· article· en· W3122241329 on OpenAlexaffabout
Tasnia Sharin, Kim L. Williams, Suzanne Chiu, Doug Crump, Jason M. O’Brien

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCormorantGene expressionGeneCytotoxicityViability assayCytochrome P450Bisphenol ABiologyEstrogenChemistryBiochemistryMolecular biologyIn vitroMetabolismGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A market for bisphenol A (BPA) replacement compounds has emerged as a result of restrictions on the use of BPA. Some of these compounds have been detected in the environment; however, little is known about their toxicological properties. In the present study, an avian in vitro toxicogenomic approach was used to compare the effects of 5 BPA alternatives. Cell viability and mRNA expression were compared in primary embryonic hepatocytes of chicken (CEH) and double-crested cormorant (DCEH) exposed to 4,4′-(propane-2,2-diyl) diphenol (BPA), bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) methane (BPF), bis (3-allyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) sulfone (TGSH), 7-bis (4-hydroxyphenylthio)-3,5-dioxaheptane (DD-70), 2,2-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) hexafluoropropane (BPAF), and 4-hydroxyphenyl 4-isoprooxyphenylsulfone (BPSIP). Changes in gene expression were determined using 2 polymerase chain reaction (PCR) arrays: 1) species-specific ToxChips that contain genes representing toxicologically relevant pathways, and 2) chicken-specific AestroChip that measures estrogen responsive genes. In CEH and DCEH, BPA alternatives TGSH, DD-70, and BPAF were most cytotoxic. Some of the replacement compounds changed the expression of genes related to xenobiotic metabolism, bile acid, and cholesterol regulation. The rank order based on the number of genes altered on the chicken ToxChip array was TGSH > DD-70 > BPAF = BPF > 17β estradiol (E2) > BPSIP > BPA. On the cormorant ToxChip array, BPSIP altered the greatest number of genes. Based on the chicken AestroChip data, BPSIP and BPF were slightly estrogenic. These results suggest that the replacement compounds have comparable or even greater toxicity than BPA and act via different mechanisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 2021;40:1368–1378. © 2021 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. Abstract Effects of 5 bisphenol A replacements on cytotoxicity and gene expression in avian hepatocytes. BPA = bisphenol A; BPF = bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) methane; TGSH = bis (3-allyl-4-hydroxyphenyl) sulfone; DD-70 = 7-bis (4-hydroxyphenylthio)-3,5-dioxaheptane; BPAF = 2,2-bis (4-hydroxyphenyl) hexafluoropropane; BPSIP = 4-hydroxyphenyl 4-isoprooxyphenylsulfone; E2 = 17β estradiol; PCR = polymerase chain reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental Toxicology and ChemistrySame topicEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsFrench-language works237,207