PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Abstract
The PRISMA 2020 statement includes a checklist of 27 items to guide reporting of systematic reviews In this article we explain why reporting of each item is recommended, present bullet points that detail the reporting recommendations, and present examples from published reviews We hope that uptake of the PRISMA 2020 statement will lead to more transparent, complete, and accurate reporting of systematic reviews, thus facilitating evidence based decision making on 1 September
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- BMJ
- Topic
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Field
- Decision Sciences
- Canadian institutions
- BruyèrePublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityImpactOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
- Funders
- National Eye Institute
- Keywords
- Systematic reviewTerminologyGuidelineComputer scienceMEDLINEData scienceMedicineManagement sciencePathologyPolitical science
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes