MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3125726066 · doi:10.1093/jleo/ewp031

The economics of scientific misconduct

2011· article· en· W3125726066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicLaw, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMisconductLibrary scienceSchools of economic thoughtPolitical scienceSociologyLawEconomicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article The Economics of Scientific Misconduct Get access Nicola Lacetera, Nicola Lacetera * University of Toronto *Rotman School of Management and Department of Management (UT Mississauga), University of Toronto. Email: nicola.lacetera@utoronto.ca. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Lorenzo Zirulia Lorenzo Zirulia University of Bologna; KITeS, Bocconi University; and Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Volume 27, Issue 3, October 2011, Pages 568–603, https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewp031 Published: 20 October 2009

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.513
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it