Complete chloroplast genome sequencing and comparative analysis reveals changes to the chloroplast genome after allopolyploidization in <i>Cucumis</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Allopolyploids undergo “genomic shock” leading to significant genetic and epigenetic modifications. Previous studies have mainly focused on nuclear changes, while little is known about the inheritance and changes of organelle genome in allopolyploidization. The synthetic allotetraploid Cucumis ×hytivus, which is generated via hybridization between C. hystrix and C. sativus, is a useful model system for studying cytonuclear variation. Here, we report the chloroplast genome of allotetraploid C. ×hytivus and its diploid parents via sequencing and comparative analysis. The size of the obtained chloroplast genomes ranged from 154 673 to 155 760 bp, while their gene contents, gene orders, and GC contents were similar to each other. Comparative genome analysis supports chloroplast maternal inheritance. However, we identified 51 indels and 292 SNP genetic variants in the chloroplast genome of the allopolyploid C. ×hytivus relative to its female parent C. hystrix. Nine intergenic regions with rich variation were identified through comparative analysis of the chloroplast genomes within the subgenus Cucumis. The phylogenetic network based on the chloroplast genome sequences clarified the evolution and taxonomic position of the synthetic allotetraploid C. ×hytivus. The results of this study provide us with an insight into the changes of organelle genome after allopolyploidization, and a new understanding of the cytonuclear evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".