The leucine zipper EF‐hand containing transmembrane protein‐1 EF‐hand is a tripartite calcium, temperature, and pH sensor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Leucine Zipper EF‐hand containing transmembrane protein‐1 (LETM1) is an inner mitochondrial membrane protein that mediates mitochondrial calcium (Ca 2+ )/proton exchange. The matrix residing carboxyl (C)‐terminal domain contains a sequence identifiable EF‐hand motif (EF1) that is highly conserved among orthologues. Deletion of EF1 abrogates LETM1 mediated mitochondrial Ca 2+ flux, highlighting the requirement of EF1 for LETM1 function. To understand the mechanistic role of this EF‐hand in LETM1 function, we characterized the biophysical properties of EF1 in isolation. Our data show that EF1 exhibits α‐helical secondary structure that is augmented in the presence of Ca 2+ . Unexpectedly, EF1 features a weak (~mM), but specific, apparent Ca 2+ ‐binding affinity, consistent with the canonical Ca 2+ coordination geometry, suggested by our solution NMR. The low affinity is, at least in part, due to an Asp at position 12 of the binding loop, where mutation to Glu increases the affinity by ~4‐fold. Further, the binding affinity is sensitive to pH changes within the physiological range experienced by mitochondria. Remarkably, EF1 unfolds at high and low temperatures. Despite these unique EF‐hand properties, Ca 2+ binding increases the exposure of hydrophobic regions, typical of EF‐hands; however, this Ca 2+ ‐induced conformational change shifts EF1 from a monomer to higher order oligomers. Finally, we showed that a second, putative EF‐hand within LETM1 is unreactive to Ca 2+ either in isolation or tandem with EF1. Collectively, our data reveal that EF1 is structurally and biophysically responsive to pH, Ca 2+ and temperature, suggesting a role as a multipartite environmental sensor within LETM1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".